The report is that it is an initial 2 week loan which suggests scope for a longer loan if it suits all the parties.

Personally, I am quite comfortable with this loan signing. I think Dwyer is better than the options that we have currently available in the squad although I agree with many on this forum who have said that Davis played his best game for Leigh after Edwin was injured against Huddersfield.

we previously rejected signing this player because of his bad effect on the dressing room

mcnamara not near squad despite predictions on here

At this point, I think the loan makes perfect sense. Two weeks initially leaves options open while things settle. I did think that we would see McNamara in the 17, especially with Edwin down, but this seems to suggest that this may not happen in the coming weeks. I like Dwyer as a player, with my only reservation being he does sometimes give away cheap penalties.
At the end of the day, I trust Lam’s judgement and think he adds to the team until Edwin is back.

Game one done, and it was a very difficult game for any 9 to say the least, and I think Dwyer did very well overall. He has that spark from acting halfback, that gets a team on the front foot, and he puts a ton of work in on defence also. He did also display the area of his game that has always worried me, giving away a couple of needless penalties and picking up a yellow. That said the yellow was really, really soft, and somehow not repeated for an identical situation when we had the ball under the Saints posts a few minutes later.
So far, so good for me, and if (big if right now) we have the chance to sign him for the season, with a reasonable deal, I’d role those dice.

I'd be happy too if we were able to sign him.

If we were to sign brad on a permanent deal it would make a pretty lethal combo with Edwin , don't think there's ever been any doubt of Brad's ability/potential but can't say I'm privvy to the reason why he's never quite nailed down that 1st choice spot at any of his previous clubs