looks like jamies on the chain gang we could extend the guided busway to join with hs2

would like to keep him. up to coach to find the key. he done well up to Swinton and 7 games was well ott by any comparison. he had those games to build his frustration up to a high pressure game someone should have been looking to relieve the pressure
he was done by the ref in the stand and thats another issue for me. the 2nd half sat ko 1604 still playin at 1655
why cant we have a game clock think we had one in east stand previous
sorry to wander cannot condone action by acton but we need to harness and channel not dispose

I tried Google translation..But you beat that.

No he doesn't..

It's not upto the coach at all. It's upto the individual. Actons not a kid. He has to take responsibility for his own decisions.

We've got plenty of hard men in our team - Hansen, Maitua, Weston, Fui to name a few. Do any of these go round putting cheap shots on a player with his back to them?

The bottom line is, we were lucky the ref didn't see the incident on Saturday. We would've been down to 12 men and almost certainly 2 points worse off than we are. We can't afford the risk with him, certainly for the rest of this season

I agree Iggy.

Correct.

Acton is in need of what we called in the Forces, some serious attitude readjustment .....

I think everyone knows my opinion on how good I think he can be, but for now he sits the season out, not much choice anyway & goes out on loan to Oldham or Batley or somewhere next season, only this way will he learn that every action has a reaction & therefore consequences.

I really do wish he would just wise up & knuckle down to some clean, hard RL.

With regard to the ban, I can't help but agree with others that Acton's punishment is not in line with the [iNon Punishment [/i of Soward the Coward for what seems to be exactly the same offence. OK, take into account Acton's 'previous' but if Acton gets 4 then surely Cowardly gets at least 2 ?

Compare like for like offences between SL & Championship players though & the disparity is clear to see & this is partly why there is no confidence in the RFL & it's systems, no consistency & no transparency = [iNOT FIT FOR PURPOSE[/i

7 game ban for 'joining in a fight' and because he's 'quite handy' he leathered some poor Swinton bugger, like Worthington v Soward, got penalised for 'winning the fight' !


Jamie Peacock v Leigh in the Challenge Cup 2 years ago, threw lots of punches, most connected.....sin bin sufficient !




There is no way Acton's challenge v Salford was a 4 game ban, maybe he should have done a Danny Brough, and grabbed Flanagan, turned him on his back, then smashed his elbow in his face...might have only got a 2 or 3 games. Seriously this RFL disciplinary lot need sorting out......some of their punishments ( or lack of) just don't add up.
As for Jamie, If I was Neil Jukes, I would tell him that he has next season to 'cut out the crap' or you will be out of work.

The hit from Acton on Flanagan isn't seen on SKY.Not seen by match officials and probably not see by most of the crowd,yet Monday's review panel see it.Yet Mondays review panel the week before missed it.

What people see differs...Unless you already know what your looking for.

The hit is shown on Sky

How many times have we played Salford? Do you actually watch Leigh? your postings suggest not.

For what it's worth, I was in Salford yesterday evening and enjoyed a quart or two with my old mate,
Pete. He's a Salford fan through and through but, as well as giving generous congratulations and saying what a fantastic advert the match had been for the sport in general, asked "What's all this nonsense about FOUR games for your lad?"

Guess we'll never know unless the transcript of the disciplinary were to be released.