We will. No complaints on the ban, he called the ref a "spineless b'stard" after he awarded one of SHudderfield's numerous dodgy tries and was rightly sin-binned and now banned (we don't want to end up like Wendyball do we?).

We're also missing Bostock, Cording and possibly Spears. Ellis could be a doubt, he's on a holiday that was booked prior to his coming out of retirement. Not sure if he's back in time.

Doubt we'll get any ringers from our friends in LS6, so we'll be a bit light in the forwards.

Easy win for Leigh, but coffers once again brimming over, so happy days

Wouldn't happen,player has to also be in agreement with move/loan.He needs to sit down and have a hard think if RL is the career he wants to continue pursuing,to be honest.

Then I'd have him training on his own and cleaning the changing rooms until he agreed to it, or retired

Being banned for 11 of the last 14 matches must IMO amount to gross misconduct and the club could and should sack him. I cannot see any employment tribunal having sympathy with him - when by his own actions he is making himself unavailable for work.

It might seem harsh - but the club has been very patient with him - enough is enough.

We pay his wages we decide where he plays and what is best for us and the club in terms of his usefulness / potential.

All of which is diminishing as the realisation hits home he is a million miles off being a top Championship prop, never mind a Dayne Weston.

However rather than have him distract us any more I would be inclined to negotiate a severance deal and release him now.

It will be cheaper than another Acton brain fart in the MPG costing us a full season of Super League revenue. Let's be clear about that.

He has had 7 games to sit down think, along with all the other times he has been suspended.

To some point I think he was hard done by in the Swinton game,they were dishing out the rough stuff,but made an example of Jamie.The Salford game was a hard fair game ,and to do what he did could have caused a serious injury to a fellow player.For no reason the red mist seems to descend on Jamie and he goes haywire

No sympathy with Jamie - he's got what he deserves.

[i"The contact was avoidable"
"Contact was deliberate and forceful and had the potential for serious injury on opponent who was not expecting this contact."
"This was off the ball contact with player in a vulnerable position."[/i

All the above comments by the Disciplinary Panel, are relevant to Jamie's indiscretion and that, plus his 'previous', are the reasons he copped a four match ban.

Apart from the 'previous', do any of the above accusations sound familiar with what Jamie Soward was NOT tried for, last week?

Agree with everything you say there Alan.

There's doubt the Man's unable to control himself at times and, he has been punnished like no other. I cant imagine a Super League club player getting such severe punnishment and, that is the problem here! He hasn't stiff armed or head tackled anyone and more importantly, he hasnt hurt anyone!I think us Leigh fans are too gracious at times, other clubs fans would be crying outrage at these suspensions! I myself was outraged after seeing what Soward did to Gregg Worthington, is Gregg a dirty player? i dont think so and, what man wouldnt defend himself and give him what for in the process? (to mitigate and say Greggs challenge was high is a cop out!) Soward received no suspension and the following game kicked 10 goals and scored a try against Batley, do you think that is Justice? these are the same people who decided all ther incidents!

Spot on Kirkhall.

Disagree with the timing H.If action is to be taken,now is not the time for that either.Don't you think we've had enough upheaval for one season?Continuity in that dressing room is paramount now,no distractions.