It must be very hard for you being on the outside looking in,my second position in life is as a phylosophy councillor and from your posts I can see you are a very fragile man, lacking in confidence,who has a need to ridicule others to prove your own prowess.Which is a pity really because if you concentrated on your own ability you could rise to the status of half wit,and in time become a minion.

Is your "second position" not a philosophy councillor?

Definitely need a SL standard coach and quick. We should have won by 80 today. Clueless in attack and woeful in defence. Relied on individual skills and fitness.

Go on then - who's available?

Iestyn Harris?/

We scored 48 and had 3 more tries chalked off, 2 of which should clearly have stood. Could easily have been 60 with a better ref. Not exactly 'clueless'. We wore them down in the 1st half and then cut loose in the 2nd as they tired.

Halves were not as fluent as they could have been but we started with a brand new partnership between Riddy and Chase, then Riddy went off injured and Foster filled in well for a while before Riddy came back in for the last 20 mins or so. No wonder they were a bit disjointed.

Letting them score 2 in the last 10 minutes was a bit sloppy but hardly the end of the world. Thought Oldham played hard and never stopped trying.

A very comfortable win, some nice tries spread between forwards and backs, crash overs and long range efforts.

Thought Foster did well coming on at 9 then filling in at half back before moving into the centres when Armstrong went off injured.

Joe we Deffo don't want Harris let's give Jukesy the chance he deserves ,peplace him by all means if he isn't up to it , but give the lad a chance.

Charlie stop making excuses if the guy isn't good enough let him go, Reg Kray said that .

I'm going to assume you're taking the p!ss and say no more

won by 80 ! Blimey, didn't realize Oldham were an u-18's amatuer side !!!

With the team we have and the fact that we are full time, we should have won by 80