Well I would also like to agree with Starbug's post.

It would seem that before a ballot is taken to choose a LISA rep on the BOD's then a ballot must be sought to see if it's members wish to have one, I would suggest that an extraordinary General Meeting be called of LISA members and advertisements be inserted in both trade papers and both local one's (payed for not relying on free ones) plus internet and match day programme, either that or a postal vote.

Let us all hope enough LISA members also take this view & that common sense will prevail.

Yes' and that we do not have a postal vote which imo would be the equivalent of burning a sizeable wad of £20 notes.

Well I'm not well up on corporate law but Phil and Keiths personall bank accounts are a completely different kettle of fish to the funds held by LISA, read what I said again. Another thing in a bankruptcy court could the LISA funds be lumped in with the clubs assets with a place on the board?

Me also.

Totally agree with starbugs post. Very well put as well.

Well I for one hope that this has finally been resolved and that LISA carries on the good work without any unnecessarry expense being incurred and a token share in the club should make all members well pleased (as one of my grandsons says).

Simple answer - NO. Each is an independent legal entity (as are Keith and Phil as individuals),

Agreed, that is also how I understand it.

Completely agree with that one. As you say, there is certainly no problem with communication from the current board and it's hard to see what can be brought to the table by someone who, first and foremost, would be there as LISA's representative and therefore having to shoulder the responsibility of the membership which I would expect to be a huge burden when added to the existing pressure of being a board member.