Anyone asked the question yet as to why this has been allowed to happen. The club seems to have been run yet again badly. We the fans deserve the answer if we are being asked to provide more.

Pass

For the hundredth time on this board this has happened because our chairmans businesses have collapsed.

Only as long as we can sit in the away end.

No mate, the question is why has the club been allowed to be financed by an individual, because look what happens when it stops

Its about extra income, partnership and learning from mistakes.

When the announcement takes place it will provide a great opportunity to at long last get things in place to realise our potential, the LSV agreement again being the top of the list followed by club structures and financial obligations to meet defecits.

I hope LISA and an other can put up £60k each, but the shareholders must each match that, unless you are saying the fans fully fund the club and take 100% ownership?

LISA should get to £35k again quite easily and use that as its members decide, CC can do whatever they do, the other group will have £25k pa min to use as they also decide. If we have a community partnership then £25k pa minimum investments should be the pre req to be a shareholder/director - I am with that 100%. If one group cannot continue the investment then the gap is manageable without the chaos of the past 2 weeks. Transparency is guaranteed, fans are treated as stakeholders by culture and we shut up the bar stool geniuses.

What we have isnt a solution its a stop gap, as I understand it.

This is what happens when you leave your computer internet logged on at work.

The fans taking 100% surely couldnt work if we were promoted to Super League

They must have come on looking for the link for 'Le Private' on the Toulouse thread

and we had no infrastructure behind his cash, his decision.

Opportunities and risks, evaluate learn and do better - 'If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got'. We have a 4 year crisis cycle built around bad management and ridiculous financial planning - lets grab this opportunity and change that.

The thing you quoted above is alright, however if a party were to get a stakehold in the club for their money , why cant all parties who commit money get that?
Surely If you say a community partership with min investment of £25000, were to get a stakholding then surely so should as LISA and the corporate club members for theirs?