Quote: leyther_geezer "I bet I'm not the only who thinks this but isn't a 3year SL licence too long? As everyone expected salford & crusaders got mullered in their 1st season of 2009 SL but wot happend the next season crusaders got into the playoffs & salford didn't end up in a relegation position in the old format. So why do we need a 3 year Licence as they've already proved a couple of seasons in SL should probably get you on your feet & see you right at the highest level of RL.......?'"
You say Crusaders got into the play offs , but as we all know , the Crusaders club is not the same one that got the licence over 2 years ago
Any club , even ours given free ' licence '
![Wink icon_wink.gif](images/smilies//icon_wink.gif)
, to bring in a full squad of NRL players would do ok in SL , Salford have done 'what ' exactley ? , finish a few points better than bottom
Beside which have either seen decent improvements in attendances ? , but that also isn't relevant to the Wrexham club as the ' novelty ' value hasn't worn off yet
Franchising is a long term plan , 9,12,15 years