Ah the flat track bully argument, because everyone else was so good in those top 4 games.

What's his stats against the top four teams this year, he's already surpassed last year in 3 games. So you're flat track bully argument is tosh.

We're playing a system that plays to his strengths, he made a single mistake in a game that for me wasn't the cause, (in fact he was behind video ref for me)

He does go for kicks, he does try for last ditch tackles, but he also sometimes makes a bad decision and leaves them I could show you a dozen examples of other super league fullbacks doing the same.

I wouldn't have another SL fullback (or even Lee Penny ) and I do feel that we are quick to get on his back for very little this year when we should celebrating what he is doing this year.

For me the Dufty debate is a non starter, the right edge defence is the main issue but I'm hoping we can get some consistency there we will be there or there abouts. I thought DDIs analysis was spot on.

I think the next two games will tell us an awful lot about our season.

I agree with Wires71 in that he made a poor attempt to swipe the ball and go the length - but I don't think he even fully committed to that plan. The correct play was to put the brakes on a little, allow Johnstone to collect it and wrap him up or at the very least slow him down. Still glad we've got him though.

I think that is what is the crux of the problem. I was a big Brett fan (never saw Bert play), a goalkicking fullback, brave as a lion that could also throw a decent pass.

That is not Matt Dufty (except for the decent pass)

However I do believe he has strengths that can get us to the top. I remember watching the out of your league podcast with Gleese and he talked about building teams to get the best out of certain players and skillets.

I think that criticising Dufty for the odd missed catch or tackle is fine, I get it it's frustrating, but I feel the level of stick he gets and the quickness that people revert to the Dufty chickens out or Dufty is a poor defensive full back isn't proportionate, isn't Wires worst problem and is down to perception of what a fullback rugby player should be rather than what is actually going on.

Yep, I agree. I'm not trying to pin all the blame on Dufty for us losing on Saturday. Just pointing out an incident that is part of a wider issue with his attitude.



We're currently in the top 4 so there are only 3 other teams, of which we have played 1 twice, as you know. He has scored a try in each game against Catalan but also cost us a try in each game by not even attempting to contest kicks so I'm not sure how that is tosh. I imagine it will look the same after we have played Wigan and Saints





I would love you to show me another dozen examples of what we saw from Dufty on Saturday as I think you'll struggle to find any clubs bar the bottom few where this had occurred. The only other player with similar tendencies is Field, but he seems to have gotten better in those situations since he first came into superleague.



I agree but would extend the period into the 2nd June. At that point we will have played Wigan as well. And also Catalans a third time before we have even played Wigan which is just stupid.

I know Duftys strengths. I'm not trying to say he is a terrible player. In attack he is fantastic but I'll never be on board with someone who wimps out of certain situations because it's those types of players that usually end up costing you the big, tight games.

For top 4 read last year's top 4 for comparison ie HKR and he only has 1 against Catalans but yeah let's see after Wigan and Saints, but I'm certain his record will be better this year.

I think I can quite comfortably find a dozen incidents in Super League of players letting a ball bounce or not going for a high ball. I'd also agree with you on Field in that he is a similar (yet not as good) player as Dufty and that his defence has improved particularly his cover tackle I don't get why you can't see the same in Dufty.

I understand your frustations with Dufty and that these don't frustrate me as much because of his positives, and I really hope that you aren't right that it costs us in a big game, and that we are talking about how Duftys try won us a GF/challenge cup.

What I genuinely hope for is that we don't have to have these discussions and that our major issues is the trophy cabinet is too small and the bill for cleaning our silverware is crippling.

Hang on we’re not talking 2nd half of the season Ben Barba style defence!

Dufty plain and simple on three occasions has chickened out of attempting to catch a high ball.. that’s not a mistake that’s a problem within Dufty himself.. as good as he has been these last few months it doesn’t excuse him for not having the balls to make a decent effort catching the high ball..

The only one harking on about past errors is you.

His tackle attempt in that game was pretty poor and cost a try, hence my comment. I think most reasonable posters on here would agree with me.

He's no Steve Hampson for sure, but what to do with him? Do you drop our most dangerous offensive player?

I think not cos he scores/makes more than he let's in but I'm sure he will be being worked on. Some of the tries he has let in have been a bit strange. Who would come in? We might have a similar problem.

Exactly. Thewlis has not looked rock solid in defence or under a high kick recently either and we are trying to move on from Ratchford.

Dufty earns his place for me, he is a dangerous player and entertaining to watch. His deficiencies can be worked on and you cannot coach pace.

Hope the coaching staff can install confidence and make sure he at least try’s to attempt a catch.. I’d stick with him, it seems we have no one better. Thewlis has started to look shaky as well, so that rules him out.. fingers crossed that Burgess works on a plan to get the covering defence to work harder at shielding Dufty on the high kicks and not leave him exposed to oncoming attackers

In Dufty's case, I think that's the point of the debate, there's no need for over reaction to any criticism.

AFAIC I wouldn't lose his attacking threat if he continues in this season's vein of form, then fine by me. We accept he has flaws and work on strategies to cope with them. He's not suddenly going to become a Hampson or Hodgson, you can't coach that IMO, but we need to protect him a bit better from the chase and try and get the opposition kicking from deeper and apply pressure rather than letting the likes of Abdul kick us to death, which will be an opposition blue print as team's sniff out a perceived weakness.

Agreed UR, pressuring the kicker (while not going so far as attempting to charge down every kick as per TS) and giving Dufty “coverage” are the ares to concentrate on. Abdul was given way too much time, we all knew what he was going to do so the players must have, there just didn’t seem to be a plan.
I guess Marshall will be working overtime on how to deal with it as every team will see it as a blueprint. Unless we bring Ratchford back in as a specialist to deal with that threat, and to kick goals.

Ratchford at centre I mean.