Quote: Irregs#16 "1. Ensuring the RFL can get insurance to cover against potential head injury claims down the line. [iSurely some kind of waiver (if players agree to sign) can prevent this in the future. [/i 2. Ensuring the RFL has a defence that "reasonable endeavours" were taken under their implied duty of care to the players [iIt has never been legal to tackle around the head, but the speed, strength and intensity of RL will lead to some head contact. I would argue, that a lot of the concussions actually are to the defending players so how to we avoid that - only allow players to jog into contact, only play touch?[/i I have said it on other platforms, but I don't see how Boxing, MMA, UFC can get insurance for their fighters, but RL can't.'" 1. A waiver is intended to inform the participants of an activity of the potential risk of harm. However, this doesn't mean they can be negligent or relinquish the duty of care they will have. https://www.slatergordon.co.uk/personal ... ill%20have. 2. I agree. It is part and parcel of the game. If you don't want injuries (even accidental) don't play RL. Don't request a change to the game. I don't know how boxing, MMA and UFC manage to keep a sport that involves purposeful smashing of an opponents head with no protection either.

Quote: Irregs#16 "1. Ensuring the RFL can get insurance to cover against potential head injury claims down the line. [iSurely some kind of waiver (if players agree to sign) can prevent this in the future. [/i 2. Ensuring the RFL has a defence that "reasonable endeavours" were taken under their implied duty of care to the players [iIt has never been legal to tackle around the head, but the speed, strength and intensity of RL will lead to some head contact. I would argue, that a lot of the concussions actually are to the defending players so how to we avoid that - only allow players to jog into contact, only play touch?[/i I have said it on other platforms, but I don't see how Boxing, MMA, UFC can get insurance for their fighters, but RL can't.'" 1. A waiver is intended to inform the participants of an activity of the potential risk of harm. However, this doesn't mean they can be negligent or relinquish the duty of care they will have. https://www.slatergordon.co.uk/personal ... ill%20have. 2. I agree. It is part and parcel of the game. If you don't want injuries (even accidental) don't play RL. Don't request a change to the game. I don't know how boxing, MMA and UFC manage to keep a sport that involves purposeful smashing of an opponents head with no protection either.

Excellent post. There is a group action by over 200 rugby union players that's due in the High Court in April/May, I think. They are suing World Rugby, the Rugby Football Union and the Welsh Rugby Union over concussions and head injuries. The outcome of that case will have major implications for how rugby league moves forward.
But I agree with you that the game we love is in danger of disappearing. The whole 'head contact' thing opens up a can of worms regarding gamesmanship too. Any player who feels the slightest contact on the head is now going to stay down, causing the referee to stop the game, and the video ref to look at a slow-mo replay that makes the 'incident' look much worse than it was. Add in fans going "Oooooohhh" every time it's shown on the big screen, and the inevitable is going to happen. 2024: Year of the Disciplinary.

Christ don't get me started on the wall. This is so Warrington it's not even funny. Capturing and immortalising in brick paint for eternity the most uninspiring period of our times with a poor coach that blew 7 years of goodwill.

It's like seeing Brendan Rodgers murals over the streets of Liverpool.

Did you miss Alex Murphy then?

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... s-tribunal

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/62 ... s-tribunal

Relaxing the rules for the world club challenge this weekend, you couldn’t write it, what a joke, run by clowns.

I still don't know what Crowther did! EDIT: his sin binning I guess. Would've thought that was sufficient. Joke.

So after the chat about Pele getting 14 he only gets 3. Right I’m not saying he should have got 14 but only 3 when Vaughan gets 4 for helping a player to stand up.

Can we petition our wonderful CEO via the magic of social media to stop that flaming mural being painted?!

This is proof, should proof be needed, that the disciplinary panel are a joke!

May as well paint Charlie Caroli on the pub wall, it's a lot more fitting

Wow. Connected, and with intent. It’s worse to help a player up in case they’re injured, than to be the one who injures them. Are there absolutely no avenues for opening up dialogue with the RFL on this, or is it a little Hitlers club?

Makes absolutely no sense. That incident was close to, if not, assault.

According to the RFL's website, Pele "was referred to tribunal on a Grade E Head Contact Charge after being dismissed in the opening round of the Betfred Super League against Hull KR. He challenged the grading, which was adjudged to be correct."
How then has he only got three games, when Grade E is listed as 4-6 games?