He’s a better 2nd row than Hughes I’d say, so he’d improve us and likely won’t cost huge money freeing up spend for elsewhere. That would free Hughes up to play at 13 where I think he would be better suited anyway...

If being better thank Hughes is the yardstick, then the market is overflowing. And if we’re signing him because he’s cheap, then Robson and Longstaff are being bumped back in the queue for a squad filler. Not inspiring at all

I would imagine this means that Jason Clark won't be getting a new contract and Holmes is his replacement. If Clark going and Holmes coming in gives us the money to give king the contract he wants then it could e a good move. From what I've seen Holmes is a more dynamic second row and a decent replacement in the squad.

This is a start if it's confirmed, there are more important signings to be made (Mamo and King are the 2 I'm thinking of as priorities here). We definitely need a new right centre, we could have 1 or 2 halfback spots to fill as well depending on whether Austin and widdop both leave. Could be a lot of changes going in to next season.

Longstaff is still young and has a fair bit of developing to do, I Like what I've seen of him, he tackles above his weight and doesnt shirk anything but he's very young and raw.

Robson I haven't seen anything in his limited showings to suggest he deserves the run on the team which he badly needs at his age. I think injuries/ suspensions are probably the only thing that will give him his chance.

Hmm did they? Or did they rate his loyalty and his service as a one club man? As someone who follows Rabbitohs I’m not sure there were many wanting him to stay.

Maybe the bar isn’t particularly high what with signing Latu and Akauola in recent years but for me it’s a solid signing for a squad player, similar to the Mulhern one.

Now the article links us with Ma’utia, I wouldn’t be happy with him as a starting centre.

Who if available would you sign at centre, Inglis won’t be here and possibly King so we going to need someone.

Just reading Casforum most are blaming Powell and saying he is in the ear of the players, only one says how do they not know the players have approached Powell. Looking and that it could just be that and they want to continue being coached by Powell. Either way I guess Powell will always be blamed.

I’d rather Mamo at centre than sign Ma’tautia.

Also someone mentioned Tom Davis the other day being a good winger. I believe there’s interest from us and he could sign.

Yeh Mamo on current form needs a new deal.

I’d play Oliver Homes left channel backrow and move Currie straight to 13 and give him the shirt.

Happy with the Oliver Holmes signing if true... As previously stated I would rather we focus on resigning King & Mamo - they would be my prefer centre partnership for next year as oppose to trying to sign Mata’utia.

Which Castleford player will we be linked with next? Can’t imagine the fans and the board would be happy about us pinching some of their better players.

Currently we only have Hughes, Currie, Robson who are out and out second rowers, Holmes plays that left channel very well for Cas and can cover at lose forward also. I would say he’s an improvement on JClark, who I suspect he will be replacing.

anychance someone who's using the term ''dynamic' please explain what they mean by this, unless it means "direct running, straightforward no frills backrower (who can play front row if needed)"

I just mean a little more than 1 dimensional, as in doesn't just carry it in, get tackled get a slow play the ball, be a bit pointless from an attacking point of view.

I mean a second row who gets the ball out to the centre when given the chance, a good carrier, good tackler, has an offload in them, runs (good) attacking lines and is just a little more difficult to play against, you know doesn't just blunt the attack at every given chance. Hope that helps, perhaps you have a different term that is more forum correct?

I hold my hands up as I used it when espousing the virtues of replacing Hughes at SR which was not unequivocally well received which is fine. What I meant and why I used it is the Google definition that dynamic is "positive in attitude full of energy and new ideas".

For all his qualities this is a charge that can not be levelled at Hughes, so I suppose it depends on what you want your backrowers to be?

Funnily enough, i would describe hughes moreso, as being 'dynamic' than holmes, good tackler, adapts to multiple positions including in the backs, and has seems to be super liked by most coaches.

Holmes (and massey as well) just seems to be a biff n barge 2nd rower that if Baz ne Tez didn't keep screaming 'underrated this man' at every player on tv, i wouldn't really notice.

That being said, i will hold my hands up and say, i have mentioned in the past about our backrow being uneven/passive in terms of punch and go forward, so he does address that, i just dont think he's a massive addition, and certainly isn't anywhere near as good as currie so shouldn't be replacing him..