Same as in amateur junior games, you have to get permission from all parents present.

Yeah, my mate was stopped from taking a photo of her own son with wolfie last week. Saw some people being stopped from taking pics of the St Oswalds kids at half time when they did lap of honour

Its the same in most walks of life unfortunately a few idiots have led to a state where a lot of parents get suspicious of anyone they don't know/trust taking pictures of their children therefore unless you have prior permission to do so then its not really an option.

i didnt know that. i take pitctures of my lad when he plays for rylands and no one has ever said anything.

Quote: gateaux "Its the same in most walks of life unfortunately a few idiots have led to a state where a lot of parents get suspicious of anyone they don't know/trust taking pictures of their children therefore unless you have prior permission to do so then its not really an option.'" Take a look at this article from the Daily Mail last week www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -told.html

Quote: gateaux "Its the same in most walks of life unfortunately a few idiots have led to a state where a lot of parents get suspicious of anyone they don't know/trust taking pictures of their children therefore unless you have prior permission to do so then its not really an option.'" Take a look at this article from the Daily Mail last week www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -told.html

I've heard someone was taking illegal photographs of Warrington's number 25.

Well member of my family got her picture will Wolfie and the steward moved out the way for us and I had my picutre with Bridge today.

But I think the issue in grounds isn't to do with child protection as such and more to do with the fact that the give out passes to people with permission to take photographs and therefore they obviously don't want people to take their own pictures and at every ground I have visited it states clearly that people aren't allowed to use cameras, so the stewards probably have instructions to warn people no matter what they are taking photos of as the ground regulations are pretty clear that its not allowed.

Its time common sense came into being and people used their nouses

It is but if one parent for whatever reason doesn't want their child being photographed then does anyone else have the right to say "tough" you have to? and at rugby games/sports days/plays etc this is often the issue.

If all parents consent then its fine but if one says no (and believe me their are a wide variety of reasons they say no) then surely this has to be respected?

What I've never understood is why taking pictures of kids playing rugby would be something paedos will do?

Not that I'm a connoisseur of child porn but surely the sorts of images on those sites are something a bit more hardcore than kids dressed decently on a rugby pitch?

A couple of years ago my Mum got some old cinefilms converted to dvd of her and her brother and sister playing on Blackpool beach in about 1960 and there was some full on child nudity in those. I'm surprised she's not banged up with Gary Glitter.

Yep, I believe it is part of the Clubmark rules (although I may have that wrong) for child protection.

Wasn't there an incident at Salford a couple of years back that made the press of somebody taking photo's of children?

I'm not, Glitter's been free for ages.

Thats very interesting, everytime we play at Rylands we get stopped from talking photographys by Rylands club appointed "Pitch side officer" even though the Rylands team we are playing have said they have no objections to photography.