Must admit, it had passed me by (or I had forgotten) that they had changed the rule so that players were free to negotiate with clubs from 1st December. It was May 1st previously.

This could well bring forward players moving on earlier - similar to Yates this year.

Before getting too worked up, how close a friend of SB is your source?

I'm with Wires71 - I really don't believe Burgess would even contemplate a rebuilding phase. There are a few tweaks to make but if I was Burgess I would be really focussing on Leyland and Hayes developing a quality kicking game as adding that to our effort ethic would mask a few other deficiencies.

Who are you listening to & taking notice of?
I know it is out of season but come on.

Who I listen to is of no concern and I don’t take notice of anyone unless it’s actually coming from the horses mouth. If you care to look through my posts I have never claimed to know anything and only post what I’m told but never say it’s true

Oh yes it is the off season you got that right

I don’t buy into this coming season being a transitional year.
We’ve only technically lost one player from the greater of the playing roster, Drinkwater.

Why do you post what you are told even if it's not true? Do you actually believe that Sam said that it would be a transition year?

Why do you reply. Again read my post I said if it’s true I would be annoyed. But I post comments to gauge what others make think. Imagine if we never listened to anyone we would never have opinions on anything but you would like that wouldn’t you. Because all you ever do is come on here having a go at anyone having thoughts or opinions. What I would say is you often disagree/ dislike what me and some of the other posters put on here so why do you bother?

Damn

Out of popcorn.

It sounds like a defence of spreading fake news.

You are now beyond pathetic, in what way is it defending fake news. LTS posts Leigh have offered £180,000 for Vaughan. Fitzpatrick comes out says heard nothing from Parra or his agent so someone is posting fake news or spreading lies. End of day all you are doing is trying to intimidate people because we make comments you don’t like, you do it all the time. A lot of people post what they hear on here and a few claim it to be real, I have never done that and things I know to be true I post in PM to people I get on with on here.

He/she cannot tolerate views they do not agree with and instead of reflecting internally about why that may be, he/she just wants to supress the view. Remember the nonsense of "the parents may be reading". He/she has their favourite targets too, I'm usually one, now it seems you are.

To be fair it is a legitimate query. If it comes from someone who knows SB well then I would be concerned, if it is a bloke (or woman) whose uncle’s dog groomers wife read it on Redvee I would be less concerned.
Not asking for names, just judging whether I should be concerned or if its just a “pearl clutching” exercise.

And it’s fair if it is a legitimate query, but he makes it personal. He never posts giving an opposing opinion he as a go at the poster has Wires71 said.

People are allowed to post what they want whether it be true or as you say pearl clutching. Said it once I don’t post saying it’s true unless I really do know but tbh I leave that to Abe since most trust him.

Well every day is a school day as I've learned that "pearl clutching" is actually a thing. I must admit that when I first read it my mind boggled to the point where I actually winced whilst going into defensive cover mode thinking of possible Lineham-esque attention