released for all to see

Where? Go on...

Keep digging. Cica $20k loss. Fact.

Yup. You are correct. For the avoidance of doubt"a loss is a loss and to add a player on that kind of money when you are working on a loss doesn't make sense".[/i Leaving aside the huge holes in your logic, what is your take on your own club's signings then?


Edit update

As I suspected, the rugby club accounts are "small" which means they show sod all. Means that you cannot make meaningful comparisons with the accounts of clubs like Bradford and Leeds, who present "Full" consolidated accounts.

Can see from the balance sheet though that the loss was indeed £212k. Also, that the club (as an entity) is technically insolvent, having net liabilities in excess of assets of £2.75m, But it is stated as being treated as a going concern because of support from the parent company - which has a very strong balance sheet, as strong on paper as Leeds' even.

if Chris Walker gets his way Orfords staying put.

chris walker is an absolute effing nutjob.

impressed by the way

What are the Effective dates of these accounts are they done to show the performance over a season...?

and if its this season just gone does that still shows us making a big loss even after a Wembley final and 300,000 quid thousand turnover in the club shop ?

because thats a bit poor if its the case....

in the press a while back

Including £340k received from the council that ends after next year. SO you will need to find that money somewhere or you will be making a bigger loss than warrington

I'd like to see the column on the Excel sheet that says ..

-£250,000 ... Success (Che's wages)

Rather have Matt Blythe

Oh well that's alright then. Unfounded and inaccurate press waknerage wins out over facts any day. Which report then, and when?