|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2233 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Dropkick Murphy="Dropkick Murphy"The current system does NOT reward mediocrity. When we were mediocre and ot into the play offs in lower end positions we got no rewards other than an unexpectedly enjoyable night at Headingley in 2006. The teams that finished in positions 6-8 this year were all fairly mediocre and got little reward.
This Leeds team are made of champion stuff, not mediocrity.
I'm still heartbroken that Warrington are not champions, and the fear that we never will be refuses to leave me, but to deny this Leeds team their rightful position is laughable. They got exactly what they deserved led by Super League's outstanding captain.'"
Agree completely and echoes my thoughts 100%. We couldn't replicate the standard of performance we reached against Saints away. Had we done so, I think we'd have been fine. As it is we were too ill disciplined and our kicking game wasn't nearly good enough. Leeds deserved their win.
As for concerns about Leeds winning it from 5th. There's one easy way to stop that - beat them. We had the chance the last 2 years and couldn't. They had to win at Catalans, Wigan and against us at a neutral venue in the space of 3 weeks. Very hard task and, in my view, more than wipes out any "concern" about their mediocre league campaign.
This sport is not big enough to survive on a simple league campaign to decide its Champion. Sorry, but that's true. The playoffs need to involve a lot of teams for the same reason. If we did have a league champion, we wouldn't have won that either.
That's hard to take for some but not for me. It's sport.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2900 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2022 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| ^Spot on that.
|
|
|
|
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2024 | Sep 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ian 77 Redux="Ian 77 Redux"
This sport is not big enough to survive on a simple league campaign to decide its Champion. Sorry, but that's true. The playoffs need to involve a lot of teams for the same reason. If we did have a league champion, we wouldn't have won that either.
That's hard to take for some but not for me. It's sport.'"
How old is rugby league? and out of how many of those years did it survive on a simple league campaign?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 993 | Wigan Warriors |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2024 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote MjM="MjM"Oh you have taken last week hard
I know it must be tough for you - seeing Wigan fail so spectacularly to achieve what a champion team should achieve in at least getting to the Grand Final (or any final for that matter). Warrington overcame their demons in getting there and were to a degree unlucky last night. Wigan though fell flat when it mattered and, as such, were completely unworthy of the title champions.'"
You miss the point it’s the effect the play offs and the title of champions has on the weekly rounds that’s the point, but to take up your point, tell me if Leeds are worthy Champions, why could they only finish fifth in SL?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 993 | Wigan Warriors |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2024 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote DoubleAone="DoubleAone"Still bitter and twisted I see.
The solution is to cut the number of teams and therefore the number of regular rounds in the league.
The 2 play-off semis and the final have all shown the potential and quality available in our game.
but to expect the eventual champions to play at that level of intensity over a possible 36 - 40 games in a season is just unrealistic stupid.
Leeds have just sought to garner their resources and to play to win the maximum number of trophies available and NOT the maximum number of games.
If the Wigan management cant see that simple truth then they will win what they deserve.
'"
[u Thanks for making my point for me! [/uWhy bother too much with the weekly rounds? Short change your fans on these, just save yourselves for the big one. GREAT why should fans go to the pointless weekly rounds? Good one, let’s just have a league of five or six; forget the rest they’re not going to win out anyway. I hope your blueprint for the future of SL ends up in the bin, because if it doesn’t that might be where SL will end up itself.
|
|
|
|
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Firstly, well played Wire; you can be very proud of what your team's achieved this season.
Re trophies, my preference is always the GF although that's as much about the "Rhinoglow" lasting for the entire off season and beyond. In terms of merit, I'll happily applaud Wigan for winning the LLS and yourselves for winning the CC. To my mind, all are of similar merit. And I too would be happy to see a return to a top 5 playoff system.
But I really don't see how not buying a season ticket is going to help your club make another step up (although to be fair there are far more on the Pies' board banging on about this and, perhaps understandably so). Even as a Leeds fan I'd be forced to acknowledge the greatness of a team that could win CC, LLS and GF. To my mind, yours is the side most likely to do that. It's been a few years now since Leeds have threatened to win the league; your dominance of the CC is apparent and for the first time you came very, very close to winning the GF. At a guess, your current side has one, maybe two, years with a realistic chance of the treble. Surely the thing to do is get right behind your side and go for it?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 90 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote pies-r-us="pies-r-us"You miss the point it’s the effect the play offs and the title of champions has on the weekly rounds that’s the point, but to take up your point, tell me if Leeds are worthy Champions, why could they only finish fifth in SL?'"
I guess the obvious answer is they didin't they finished Champions, but the answer to the question youu were trying to pose is because they didn't need to finish any higher and their focus on peaking at the business end of the season means they tolerate being undercooked during the regular season.
It's really not too difficult to understand, but it is obviously very difficult for many clubs to implement.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 90 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote gary numan="gary numan"How old is rugby league? and out of how many of those years did it survive on a simple league campaign?'"
Overall, in RL's history very few years have been decided by a first past the post league system.
This isn't some new concept that first arrived in 1998.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 5848 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2017 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote pies-r-us="pies-r-us"[uThanks for making my point for me! [/uWhy bother too much with the weekly rounds? Short change your fans on these, just save yourselves for the big one. GREAT why should fans go to the pointless weekly rounds? Good one, let’s just have a league of five or six; forget the rest they’re not going to win out anyway. I hope your blueprint for the future of SL ends up in the bin, because if it doesn’t that might be where SL will end up itself.'"
[uI see you continue to be deliberatlely obtuse but never mind.[/u
Personally I would go with the a certain Mr J Peacock`s view and cut the league to 10 teams and have a more intensive competition
I would award the Championship title to the league winners and have a separate play-off end of season trophy and retain the CC has it stands for all teams.
The cost would be a higher gate charge so clubs maintain current income.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 4694 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote Clearwing="Clearwing"Firstly, well played Wire; you can be very proud of what your team's achieved this season.
Re trophies, my preference is always the GF although that's as much about the "Rhinoglow" lasting for the entire off season and beyond. In terms of merit, I'll happily applaud Wigan for winning the LLS and yourselves for winning the CC. To my mind, all are of similar merit. And I too would be happy to see a return to a top 5 playoff system.
But I really don't see how not buying a season ticket is going to help your club make another step up (although to be fair there are far more on the Pies' board banging on about this and, perhaps understandably so). Even as a Leeds fan I'd be forced to acknowledge the greatness of a team that could win CC, LLS and GF. To my mind, yours is the side most likely to do that. It's been a few years now since Leeds have threatened to win the league; your dominance of the CC is apparent and for the first time you came very, very close to winning the GF. At a guess, your current side has one, maybe two, years with a realistic chance of the treble. Surely the thing to do is get right behind your side and go for it?'"
Firstly, I think this is a fair and unbiased comment on a tricky problem. However, i dont think the issue is about one club (Wire in this instance) losing their ST holders, but rather RL fans in general. My concern is that in trying to 'milk the golden cow' via the playoff system, the RL will lose revenue via fans disinterest in the regular season. There can be no doubt that the playoffs rake in a lot of money for the governing body; the final alone must have creamed in the region of £1.4 million, but at what price for regular games in 2013 ?
And all of this problem could be easily rectified by elevating the value (in some manner) of the LLS. A low key cup perhaps ? I don't know exactly where the 'value' should be pitched, and it would obviously need to be below that of the GF, but Wigan do deserve more (IMO) for winning the league, and as a RL fan, I do feel they deserved more from their season.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 993 | Wigan Warriors |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2024 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote DoubleAone="DoubleAone"[uI see you continue to be deliberatlely obtuse but never mind.[/u
Personally I would go with the a certain Mr J Peacock`s view and cut the league to 10 teams and have a more intensive competition
I would award the championship the the league winners and have a separate play-off end of season trophy and retain the CC has it stands for all tems
The cost would be a higher gate charge so clubs maintain current income.'"
Obtuse, I don’t like to get personal myself, but sometimes it’s hard not to give into it when you can’t promote any kind of cogent argument, so I won’t. Let’s just wait and see whose view of the shape of things was clearer, yours or mine!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4190 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2018 | Jan 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Winslade's Offload="Winslade's Offload"Firstly, I think this is a fair and unbiased comment on a tricky problem. However, i dont think the issue is about one club (Wire in this instance) losing their ST holders, but rather RL fans in general. My concern is that in trying to 'milk the golden cow' via the playoff system, the RL will lose revenue via fans disinterest in the regular season. There can be no doubt that the playoffs rake in a lot of money for the governing body; the final alone must have creamed in the region of £1.4 million, but at what price for regular games in 2013 ?
And all of this problem could be easily rectified by elevating the value (in some manner) of the LLS. A low key cup perhaps ? I don't know exactly where the 'value' should be pitched, and it would obviously need to be below that of the GF, but Wigan do deserve more (IMO) for winning the league, and as a RL fan, I do feel they deserved more from their season.'"
I've been ST holder since we moved into the HJ despite knowing that I would miss 3 or 4 games each season. The fact that I've been missing so many games has been making me rethink buying a season ticket for the past few years now, but the benefits (knowing I have a ticket when I am able to go without having to buy one, first dabs on semi final and finals tickets, 10% discount in the shop, etc) have kept me dipping my hand into my pocket.
But now, I do think there was a drop in the quality and intensity of games last season, not just Wire but across the league. Is this just a general dip or are the clubs/coaches/players starting to feel the same as the fans and realise that making the top eight is the only thing that counts. The 27 rounds of Super League are merely a qualifying competition, where at least five clubs start the season almost certain of making it, to get into a three or four game finals tournament. Do I really want to pay for a season ticket when I'll only see maybe ten games, and of those ten, in five or six of them we are likely to be playing without four, five or more of our 'star' players. Other than possible bragging rights against our near neighbours, none of the league games really mean that much anymore.
Leeds winning from fifth is a fantastic acheivement, and doing it twice is just incredible, and they should be applauded for it. It might be great for Leeds and their fans, but I wonder whether it really is that good for the game in general both on, and off the pitch.
|
|
|
 |
|