Quote sanjunien="sanjunien""cheating,gamesmanship,professional foul" etc etc call it what you will - it's always gone on and always will,end of. I think it was Dame Eddie H who says "he (Sam T),has an old head on young shoulders"
regarding Phil Clarke (Mr Wigan),I don't have a problem with him or Dame Eddie or Stevo or the rest,i'm just glad that Sky Sports are prepared to keep on investing in a 'minority' sport with moderate viewing figures etc - just imagine what would have happened to RL if Sky hadn't been around ! I wish you lot would STOP MOANING and just get on with enjoying the game...
As a Saints fan,I would love to see young Sam turn out for us,cheat or not...'"
You are right in that there have always been and will always be players that push their luck/ stretch the rules for the benefit of the team - not the benefit of the game. Every team has them - they are heroes for your team and villains for everyone else.
What McGuire did was instinctive in the heat of the game. It didn't 'cost' Wigan the game - we will never know if Carmont would have gone on to score the try. The Tomkins Two do it every week, whether its Sam with his arm trap (think about it, he dislocated his finger last night and played a portion of the game with just one arm, hence he didn't do it as much) and Joel with his kicking out, rubbing his head in etc. Which is worse - probably the Terrible Two because they purposely do it every week as part of their game. We can agree to disagree on that, as if they played for us I would probably defend them too.
The point that people are trying to make is that no one deserves an injury, no one who is injured deserves to be told he deserves it. By all means he can discuss the tackle/ foul whatever you call it, but to publicly call the player a cheat a week later is bringing the game into disrepute. Phil Clarke is paid to present the sport of rugby league not Wigan RLFC and his rantings have become an embarrassment. Wigan don't play the game on their own and both sides deserve evened reasoning and unbiased commentary.