Oh we are still here. It's not like he did exactly this at Souths and Parra. Oh wait! Yeah he did.

Sandow is certainly playing with a smile on his face, but you can also see that he is enjoying his game from the exuberance of his play. That for me is a key point, because it is a strong incentive to stay over here rather than be on a tight leash in Oz. And at 27, and with the cash to ensure nobody else poaches him, we may see the little genius for quite a few years in the P&B.

Didn't he start off very well at Souths then continue to be a mainstay for 4 seasons, only leaving when he was offered a better deal (which he said was with his family in mind)? Then he left Parra because of difference of opinions with the coach. I don't want to assume you are, but it seems like you're trying to say that he started out playing well at his other clubs then turned out to be less than?

Ignore Sgt Wilko everyone we sign is sh*te and everyone Leeds sign are world beaters, so Sgt how is Galloway doing?

Being a Wests Tigers follower Galloway is exactly the same as he was in the NRL. His stats are pretty much identical. Anyone who expects anything different don't know the player.

Hills' tacking stats are impressive.
99% completion.
1 missed tacked out of nearly 200 in 6 games.

Is Sandow your marquee player?

Apparently not. My understanding is that Sam Tomkins is the only player in SL where a club has exercised the marquee player option.

Think you're wrong there.

This was from an interview with a leading agent - it could be made up of course.

"Super League general manager Blake Solly defended the role of the governing body, saying: “It’s a matter for both the clubs and for Super League to decide whether that cap goes up, it’s not the RFL just saying it goes up or it goes down, it’s a joint decision. “And the whole idea of the marquee player rule was to allow clubs to go and get those players or keep them. So I’m not sure what more the sport could have done to actually allow clubs to go out and get marquee players.” With the exception of Wigan, who used the new rule to accommodate the return of Sam Tomkins, clubs have ignored the chance to sign a marquee player and Harrison says the explanation is simple.

“They’re all scared to use it,” he said."

I also think he is wrong.
I don't think Leeds have used the Marquee signing.
But I'd bet my bottom Dollar that Marwan has

I could well be wrong. What evidence do you have though? Presumably you've got some information to support your view. I'd be interested to see it as I have no idea who has made a marquee signing. The only information I have is a newspaper article but I suppose that's better than 'I think'.