Agree 100% on the cap issue, as a Leeds fan, im hugely disappointed in my club for being in favour of a reduced cap. Think Leeds have handled the whole lockdown situation very poorly, as fans worrying for our game and our clubs, crying out for something positive, Leeds have constantly pushed doom and gloom articles out to the point of it getting tiresome.

If your multi millionaire owner wants to put enough money in to enable Wire to pay 2. 1m, but our multi millionaire owner dosnt, why should Warringtons be prevented from doing so? He shouldnt be prevented, like i say, disappointed with Leeds

..,,and how right I was UR.

Bet you’ve never be happier to have an idea splattered.

I wonder if Hetherington's approach is motivated by wanting to have stronger leverage in negotiations with players.

"Look mate, we want to keep you, but the salary cap is lower now and we have to cut our cloth accordingly. You'll not get any more elsewhere, they have the same restrictions as us".

Another one? He signed a new contract before he went on loan with a big increase in wages.

The Gelling issue and injury to Ashton, highlighted a dropped bollox. Livett in our squad, on the bench even, would have covered our backs.
He’s the one of very few players if any that can play and position except prop...and not just a cover, but as well as almost any player in there position in SL.
That is one very handy string to have in a bow.

Get him back and on our bench...that’s 1234567,9,11,12,13 all covered. Loaning him out was the biggest brain fart other than failing to land a big prop, that’s happened since trying to sign a player, Roberts, that clearly didn’t want to come here.

When you are doing hyperbole like this I like to read it in Paul Cullen's voice.

Iirc Livett signed an extension during the 2018 season mainly after a handful of big games (Leeds away being the stand out) and as you say a believed substantial wage increase.
He's on the list of players up at the end of this season (whenever that is).

I know what you are driving at but player contracts will be governed by a spefic date regardless of how long the season does or doesn't drag on for. Messy!

Over on the Pie front, they believe Currie is heading that way...

Don't think they want him. They are saying Greenwood is a better player if they can get him fit.

It's more an issue of dedication and willingness with Greenwood. Most of us think he is a superb player. We signed him unfit but he came straight in and played brilliantly but since Lam has come in something has gone very wrong. Nobody seems to know what.

But you signed Mamo to do that job. Honestly can't see why the Warrington coaching staff don't see Livett's potential.

I dunno... perhaps they get to see him everyday in training, or something??

BMM possibly with a loan deal to the Warriors this season? I'd be ok with it, assuming he came back here once our season was back up and running, could mean we have a battle hardened BMM to come straight back in. Concern would be whether we would be able to get him back. Although if we get a fee that we can use to bring in Josh Jones / MckMeeken early.....? https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/i-know ... 54v5g.html

BMM possibly with a loan deal to the Warriors this season? I'd be ok with it, assuming he came back here once our season was back up and running, could mean we have a battle hardened BMM to come straight back in. Concern would be whether we would be able to get him back. Although if we get a fee that we can use to bring in Josh Jones / MckMeeken early.....? https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/i-know ... 54v5g.html

Agree.
It is a bit of a mystery as to what has "gone wrong" with Harvey but as the "Slot" says we don't see him in training every day., Having said that, neither to our coaches as he is on loan at HKR but you know what I mean. Looked like a great prospect when he first broke through