No, translated as "do one, nobody cares what you think or say, so go say it on the Saints message board" (or are you banned/hated by your fellow supporters too)

Long is off contract at the end of this season and I am sure would welcome a move to be closer to his drinking/gambling and all round aircraft antics buddy, Martin Gleeson. A word of caution, the taking of kicks at goal would not form part of his contract.
With the wedge freed up by Long's departure we'd be able to get Lockyer no messin'. It's a win, win, win, win situation.
Get him signed, now!!!!

We don't need Long, he'd be a waste of money. Were looking to the future, rather have Bridge than Long.

we dont need any more star players in either of those positions IMO... maybe back ups in the halfback position...but bridge and Briers are the right men for the job and clarke and Baby gleese are good hookers

Ah, so only pro Warrington views are allowed on this forum?

Why dont you just admit that its ludicrous that (some) Wire fans are discussing replacing a player that doesnt even play for you. Its glaringly obvious that you realise this anyway, because the only way you respond to my points are with hostility. If I was wrong then you could point out where, but really you know Im right.

My comments are within topic and (more importantly) 100% true whether certain Wire fans on here like it or not.

It was obvious that the club were planning next year based on Johns decision in May (which ever way the decision went). All people are doing now is speculating who we could sign for the pivitol position of Half Back (some supporters think that is what is missing from our team this year and next)

The reason people are hostile to you is that you think you are the Mesiah. What divine right do you have to tell Warrington fans what they can and cant discuss. If you dont like it or dont agree with it then don't read it and don't post on the thread. Simple.

So, let me guess this right. The topic is about who we sholud sign as a prospective halfback, seeing as the main target is retiring.

Your comments are regarding the arrogance of fans and how Johns was not down to sign anyway.

What does that have to do with prospective signings for next year.

PS

Brent Sherwin is off contract next year. One for the melting pot.

See how simple that was?

How's about a BOGOF, we'll throw in Sculthorpe as well? Enough wedge freed there for us to sign Sonny Bill Williams. Whammo, bammo!

Of course there's nowt wrong with that, but the thread says replace. It implies that he was yours but now he isnt.

Cut out the swearing.

I don't care if its spelt incorrectly.

And anyway, I agree with saintc

saintc is right, we don't have Andrew Johns so why do we need to sign a 'replacement'. It's as logical as saying we are 'missing' Adrian Morley. All that massive contribution Morley has made to us over the years - when you take him out of the side, how can we compete!

We don't need a replacement for Johns (as has been said, how can you replace what you didn't have in the first place), but we still need a halfback for next season. IMO Bridge, Clarke and Anderson are all adequate cover in the half back role, but none of them are genuine full time half backs.

My current favourite would be Robinson. I think he would complement our squad, and is likely to be hungry for success. We could probably offer him considerabley more than he is on currently, and still have change, and a quota spot, from the money we would have paid Johns. Is it worth discussing a deal with Salford for Robinson now? If Salford go down he becomes a free agent anyway and Salford get nothing, at least if we bought him now, then loaned him back for the remainder of the season Salford get some compensation. They could stay up then lose Robinson, but that would be the gamble Salford would be taking for the money now!

Use the money saved to help entice Buderus to SL.