I think you need a seperate thread for this debate as the original one has gone off track a bit.

"The Great Michael Monaghan v Jon Clarke debate."

You can't call it really ......

im not so sure about Monaghan now someone has pointed out this flaw in his game.

what would we do without the internet.

That tickled me

Saddened-esque:

Comparing Jon Clarke and Michael Monaghan is like comparing Beyonce to Heather out of EastEnders.

True story time - i was a hooker in the same age group as cunningham and long.... they played for wigan st judes.. i played for crossfields/grappenhall..... i hooked for warrington and lancashire.... cunningham was left on the bench for lancashire or moved to 13 behind my exceptional hooking game.

so i think we can safely say im deffo better than clarke.... and possibly Monaghan.

Next Joke please.

The rain is coming = we will struggle with ball retention so that'll help Cas.

42-14.

Michael Monaghan gets over-excited when we get a quick play-the-ball and sometimes runs off without lifting his head.

Watch him, its fact

i think personally monaghan and clarke should be played at the same time with clarke Playing loose forward and sharing the dummy half role dependent on pitch position clarke on the run up with monnas taking over at the kill point towards the opponents 20 meter line

I think Clarke should play at the same time as Monas too, but for someone else.

I think I have accidentally stumbled into a strange parallel universe...somethings not quite right in this one...must wake up!!!

Was Carl Webb really good in this dimension?

At half time