FORUMS > Warrington Wolves > Paul Wood @ Swinton |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3648 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
50409_1268084441.jpg Deus Dat Incrementum:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50409.jpg |
|
| Quote: Kevin Turvey "Tis would be completely mad. I know Ormsby only signed his new deal at the end of last season and Mendieka had a great game on Boxing Day. I hope this is confirmation of season long loans.'"
Just spoken to Walker, the above players (plus Burke) have signed for Swinton, on one year contracts.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1207 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
65133_1721740556.jpeg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_65133.jpeg |
|
| Quote: Ganson's Optician "Just spoken to Walker, the above players (plus Burke) have signed for Swinton, on one year contracts.'"
Perhaps we have first option on them if they cut it at open age level?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3648 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
50409_1268084441.jpg Deus Dat Incrementum:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50409.jpg |
|
| Quote: Kevin Turvey "Perhaps we have first option on them if they cut it at open age level?'"
I imagine their will be a few clauses like that in their contract.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 4688 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
Moderator
|
| Thinking this over, and if the Wire players have actually signed for Swinton, then my personal view is that Wire have stuck two fingers up at the current system;
We know they have spent a lot of time and money developing a strong youth system, and we know they were dead against theses changes. At the start of the season we had approximately 10 over-age players ( not eligible for the U19's ). With only 5 available DR places available at Swinton, this would mean that this group were never going to get a game each week. No doubt Hetherington would have been delighted to see them released, and lost to Wire. So they have stayed within the rules by moving them to a one year contract with Swinton, and presumably as suggested above, they will return to Wire either via a contract clause, or their own free will at the end of the season.
It's clear Wire have not abandoned their youth development policy and are determined to hold onto their youth system. From what I can see, we have 27 U19 players on the books as well. That must surely be the largest contingent I can recall. Unless someone knows better ? Walter ?
With new money coming into the game, lets hope the SL clubs decide to reverse some of these changes and invest money into their youth development once again.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7605 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | May 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Paul Youane "I guess the other six will be on season long loans at Swinton and will be loaned back to Warrington for a minimum of a month if required.'"
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3648 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2018 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
50409_1268084441.jpg Deus Dat Incrementum:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50409.jpg |
|
| Quote: Winslade's Offload "Thinking this over, and if the Wire players have actually signed for Swinton, then my personal view is that Wire have stuck two fingers up at the current system;
We know they have spent a lot of time and money developing a strong youth system, and we know they were dead against theses changes. At the start of the season we had approximately 10 over-age players ( not eligible for the U19's ). With only 5 available DR places available at Swinton, this would mean that this group were never going to get a game each week. No doubt Hetherington would have been delighted to see them released, and lost to Wire. So they have stayed within the rules by moving them to a one year contract with Swinton, and presumably as suggested above, they will return to Wire either via a contract clause, or their own free will at the end of the season.
It's clear Wire have not abandoned their youth development policy and are determined to hold onto their youth system. From what I can see, we have 27 U19 players on the books as well. That must surely be the largest contingent I can recall. Unless someone knows better ? Walter ?
With new money coming into the game, lets hope the SL clubs decide to reverse some of these changes and invest money into their youth development once again.'"
I think that is the case, if not we have inadvertently highlighted what many of us have been saying for a long time- the system is flawed and has more holes than a sieve.
With regards to your last point, my fear is that if we once again move the goalposts young lads (and their parents!) will become fed up and look elsewhere, namely the 15 man code.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5506 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| There is an article on sportinglife with the title " Wolves to extend winning run " . A few lines into the article it states that all Warrington players are dual registered with Swinton .
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 16250 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
953.jpg 2015 - major missed opportunity, 2016 - stronger teams = harder task (no problem there then), 2017 - OMG What now!!!:953.jpg |
|
| Except the 5 that have left wire to sign for swinton. They have circumvented the rules and both clubs should be hauled up in front of the rfl. This now allows wire 10th places inthe swinton side. No way have they let those players go. It might look that way on paper though. DR the whole squad is fine as only 5 are allowed to play. But now we see fake transfers happening to turn the lions into wire reserves.
Barney your comments re relegation are amusing as the only reason your chairman is playing this game is to avoid relegation.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 20628 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2016 | Aug 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44480_1390845286.jpg It's been fun.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44480.jpg |
|
| I'm glad Wire have done this, we are constantly being told by the RFL that we are the best run club in SL and the model for everyone to follow, we were vehemently opposed to this idea so thought ok, F U and stuck two fingers up to them, good, it was a silly system they brought in in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2233 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
50086_1357229109.jpg [b:33tg3xj5]Me:[/b:33tg3xj5] I'm still reeling from the news that someone is considering watching the 1st and 3rd game on Saturday and NOT watching Warrington play. It's like being in Shea Stadium when the Beatles came to town and deciding to nip out for a fag.
[b:33tg3xj5]knockersbumpMKII:[/b:33tg3xj5] Is it FOOK, you're good but you're not THAT good, jesus you wanky fans need to get over yourselves, Beatles at the Shea in '65 was a once in a lifetime opportunity for some (despite the following years performance), you can watch a very good team in primrose & yellow play every week if you really wanted to but comparing it to one of the very best music groups of all time in an iconic stadia such as the shea is overegging your importance, you're not even the best team in SL atm:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50086.jpg |
|
| Quote: DemonUK "Except the 5 that have left wire to sign for swinton. They have circumvented the rules and both clubs should be hauled up in front of the rfl. This now allows wire 10th places inthe swinton side. No way have they let those players go. It might look that way on paper though. DR the whole squad is fine as only 5 are allowed to play. But now we see fake transfers happening to turn the lions into wire reserves.
Barney your comments re relegation are amusing as the only reason your chairman is playing this game is to avoid relegation.'"
If Warrington and Swinton have broken the rules they should be hauled in front of the RFL, I agree. If not, they shouldn't. What rules have they broken? I'm genuinely asking because I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 11464 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15968.gif :15968.gif |
|
| How have the rules been broken?
Warrington didn't want the old Academy/ U21s system to cease and are just finding other ways to retain and develop young talent.
They should be applauded for investing in the game.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7605 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | May 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: mark_m "How have the rules been broken?
Warrington didn't want the old Academy/ U21s system to cease and are just finding other ways to retain and develop young talent.
They should be applauded for investing in the game.'"
Exactly; Warrington are using the system to allow nine or so young players to remain in a full-time environment until they have fully developed as players.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 4688 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
Moderator
|
| Quote: DemonUK "Except the 5 that have left wire to sign for swinton. They have circumvented the rules and both clubs should be hauled up in front of the rfl. This now allows wire 10th places inthe swinton side. No way have they let those players go. It might look that way on paper though. DR the whole squad is fine as only 5 are allowed to play. But now we see fake transfers happening to turn the lions into wire reserves.
Barney your comments re relegation are amusing as the only reason your chairman is playing this game is to avoid relegation.'"
You are missing the point here. Wire are against these changes, and what they have done 'drives a coach and horses' through the 'rules' of the new system. They are pointing out that it is not only badly thought through, but ineptly managed. No firm rules have appeared, and the new system has stumbled from one problem to the next. The last issue correctly pointed out was that SL players will cause CC salary cap to be exceeded; so they introduced notional salary values for them. But there are plenty of other issues on the horizon. How about Hunslet Hawks finishing bottom and getting relegated ( Hetherington would love that). Or the grand final between Swinton with 9 Wire players vs Fev with no DR 's ?. Or the Challenge cup draw of Wire vs Swinton.
All IMO though.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 39709 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
Moderator
|
| i've just skim read it.
Have we played a blinder here for our own benefit?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3084 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2012 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2023 | Oct 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
68310_1347387017.jpeg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_68310.jpeg |
|
| I'm baffled - the only thing that is of no suprise is the RL appear to have made an unholy mess of things. I assume, and sincerely hope, that if the players have signed 1-year deals then we have an option to bring them back after that. However, I confess to be mystified by the "rules", such as they are, and they certainly seem open to errm misinterpretation.
Mendieka in particular was a player the club seemed to have high hopes for, his potential appeared to be confirmed by a strong showing on boxing day so I hope it's just a case of a one year loan dressed up to satisfy/circumvent (depending on your views) the rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|