Well Wigan obviously got the better of that deal didn't they. You have now had to sign a 32 year old injury prone overseas player to take Mathers place.

Why didn't you keep him?
Why were Huddersfield only prepared to give give Hodgson one more year?
There were quite a few on here who had their reservations on signing Hodgson when it was first muted.

we`ve probably signed the current m.o.s with the money you gave us for gleeson..mathers has done well for us..dont hear the same being said for gleeson..as long as you lot are happy...hows karl pryce doing(another one of your flops)

If you have you may well be in trouble. Transfers do not count on the salary cap. Since Gleeson came to Wigan we have won more games than Wire thanks.

Pryce was a risk, yes but a low cost English risk, again time will tell.

Were you saying the same thing about Adrian Lam? David Furner? Craig Smith? Trent Barrett?

Wigan fan calling "Wire signing (Best Fb in comp - current MOS) in shock horror.

Gleeson was brought in to be a game breaker was he not? Percentage wins mean zip if they fail to yield.

They weren't 32 or injury prone when we signed them worst examples ever!

you may have won more games but we won the one that mattered...i`ll let tony smith be the judge of the hodgson deal..i think he knows more than you...

Non of them were 32 when they first appeared for Wigan. Non of them had major spells out of the game.

I'm saying that Hodgson is a poor player, I am saying it's a risk that I wouldn't like Wigan to take, and I said exactly the same thing when about us signing Sean Long.

Your already taking the risk with Briers, I don't see why you are also doing it with Hodgson.

As I said previously, why are Huddersfield not willing to take that chance?

Poor player? How did he manage to win MOS then.

What are the implications of signing Hodgson in terms of the oversea quota for next year. As far as I understand we would have to release two players to get under the oversea player/trained limit of 5. Can anyone confirm?

Pryce gave up the final years of his lucrative rugby union contract. Why do you think he signed for Wigan on a contract that was "low cost". Not sure what time will tell - that I was right about him all along?

It seems strange that according to Wigan fans all their signings are low-cost / on pea-nuts yet you spend the full salary cap.

why are you so concerned with our signings whether they are 32 or 92..you should be more concerned with your own players..any how be thankful hodgsons out injured he may av shoved it up you lot this weekend

Hicks is definatley leaving at the end of the year.