For me, the Carvell incident was the worst of the two. He didn't simply lead with the forearm, he led with the point of his elbow. This has much more potential to cause broken jaws than leading with a 'straight' forearm and I think he'll get a 2 game ban.
Morley's challenge was late and high, 1 game ban.

Just watched the replay of the Morley hit. He is committed and as he comes in, Sherwin passes the ball and then turns and starts to drop down. Morley actually makes contact with the back of the shoulder.

Oh, and most Cas fans would love to have McGoldrick banned. A complete liability of a player.

I hope they dont get banned actually.

There will be no excuses for anyone on Saturday then.

If they are banned, that evens up the packs which will make for a closer game.

If either get anything more than a warning, our game is going soft.

Raleigh got away with flooring Matt Orford last week, Moz's incident
was very similar so hopefully they may let him off.. Carvell didnt appear to be leading with his elbow n Jackson ran into him very awkwardly so fingers crossed for them both!

So you are condoning his actions?

Carvell shouldn't get a ban Fozzard has gone into every tackle in his career the same way if not worse and nobody ever questions him so why start on Carvell ! More a case of the Cas player going in awkwardly !
Moz was late maybe get a warning committed to the tackle imo and couldn't have pulled out if he wanted to , also hit the back of the shoulder 1st warning letter would be harsh imo !

Nothing in the Carvell incident for me. Just covers himself for the impact, no malice involved. I would expect him to get a warning and no more.

The conditions didn't exactly help a bloke stopping at full tilt, with a smaller bloke ducking.

No swing in the arm, and if you watch carefully, Morley follows the ball as soon as it changes direction. A lazy challenge, Yes, but not a malicious one.

Gaz & Moz will start against the Pies next week no problem.

I couldn't confidently say either way. Personally I hope both are there against Wigan for a better match, and taking it case by case like children ("well such and such did this!"icon_wink.gif doesn't really work as the RFL don't understand the meaning of precedent, and saying it's rugby not wendyball isn't really poinient either as that is just a promotion of thuggery which puts people off the game, and also tends to be incredably hypocritical. Interesting to see how it goes, but overall like I said I wouldn't be suprised to see nothing done, and equally if they both got 2+ match bans.