Care to tell us what your prediction was for that Wakefield match?

I think I put Wakefield h)2.

Sorry Duck I was asking the Oracle (AS...).

No apologies required and thanks CH.
I did predict a loss where does AJ stats case against me leave him now?

We’re both 15 games in and 14 of those in the league, it’s hardly a couple of games. The stats are a more than fair reflection of how teams have performed so far this season, which is why Saints are 1st and 2nd on most. As for the second point I’ve no clue what you’re on about, we’ve both played every team once and both played Huddersfield twice. As I’ve said, the stats accurately represent how every team has performed, you just don’t want them to because they don’t favour Warrington.

I actually wasn’t confident on us winning that game, I didn’t make a prediction but I was unsure. However, completely irrelevant seen as I’m saying we’ll definitely beat Warrington (not Wakefield).

Get a life

Clearly he has misspelled his username, should be a double s

No its not. You at least need balance to have some fare reading from stats. This cannot be possibly achieved without every team playing 11 HOME AND 11 AWAY, as there is always a small advantage playing a home fixture, even then the stat isn't right because of Magic....
Then there are variables like game 1 and 2 Wire loose at home to Saints and Leeds because the new boss had and agenda of fixing the defence first and attack with just 5 drives and a kick. But these games are included in your 15, this affects the stats so they favour Saints over Wire.

So stick your round 15 stats up your aspidistra

Even for you this is a whole new level of rubbish. The whole post is nonsense but the part in bold is the worst and completely backs up my point that you don’t like the stats because they don’t favour Warrington. What on earth does Warringtons transitional period have to do with anything, you’ve basically said that Warrington lost so those games don’t count. Doesn’t matter what Prices agenda at the time was, you lost. And how hard is it to get into your head that 15 games is more than a big enough sample to collate accurate stats. None of this is a surprise seen as it’s coming from the same person who think that every game at the Magic will be decided by a 2 point margin.

OK. You are thick, you'd have got a better stat after rnd1. I cannot believe you didn't use that.

. I did say you wouldn't understand before wasted my time....I guess I am the bigger fool.

.I so wish we were playing one trick Saints now instead of our arch rivals Wigan, who are consistently the toughest derby opponents.

Again, I have no clue what you’re referring to with the first two sentences.

And would that be ‘one trick Saints’ who are top of the league and battered Warrington 12-30 and ‘toughest derby opponents’ Wigan who Warrington beat? Absolutely hilarious yet again.

Haven't you got that life yet.yawn yawn.

It serves me right for banter with what comes across as an inbetweener.