Nowt wrong with them.

RL fans in hissy fit, when commentators aren't praising their team to the skies, shocker

Why? I quite enjoyed them today.

Eddie was just on TalkSport having a chat with former England RU hooker Brian Moore, and it was very interesting. Away from the Sky cameras, he comes across as very knowledgable. People just pick up on traits that he has and if they are not to their satisfaction, he's hated. Same with Stevo.

Crux of the matter is they are doing a job that everyone wants to do, or think that they can do better, when they really can't.

There are not many of us as knowledgeable as Stevo. Although many of us wish to think so.

He's played the game at his highest level in the NRL and was one of the first big British successes over there.

What about John Wells?

Does he not know what he is talking about?

At this moment in time it looks increasingly like you certainly don't.

You cant have it both ways.

if you want to big up the knowledge of a pundit, that's fine... But you cant then say that you dont 'give 2 monkeys' when another one doesn't agree with your biased opinion.

Not bias.
It's there for all to see unless they choose not too.

But I don't see how Jon Wells has better authority on the decision to play Bridge at 6 than Tony Smith.

Now back on topic....swap Stevo for jon Wells?

I give up.. I just don't think you understand words properly.

Its the only possible explanation for how you conjure up absolute drivel like
'But I don't see how Jon Wells has better authority on the decision to play Bridge at 6 than Tony Smith'

All because Wells quite rightly pointed out that Bridge doesn't look comfortable at 6, as its not his usual position... Bridge is filling in at 6 and he is doing ok.. But you seem to see him as the worlds greatest stand off. When someone suggests other wise you throw your arms in the air then type cryptic nonsense.

No bias though.

I just wish they would commentate on the actual game instead of trying to ref it from beginning to end.. I do think they need to get shut of Stuart Cummings out of the commentary box, and if they just commentate on the action I'm ok with Stevo and Eddie.

You opinion is greatly excepted and debate is good.
No bias though.
If Bridge had of played pants I'd be the first to be saying we need another halfback or we need another quality prop....I have previous in that department and been slated over and over.
At this time we don't need a halfback.
Bridge is not the make do or back up 6 in this team now because GOB is fit. So he is in there on merit. I haven't seen anything in this early season performances to suggest Myler will remove him either.
So let's agree to disagree. I except your view he is a stop gap.
Back on topic. I like Stevo.

Agreed with that.

Asotasi was the the catalyst to their fight back.....just saying.


Keeping that comment in here as it is by and large, irrelevant

Indeed. I have no problem with Eddie & Stevo, very passionate and knowledgeable. Some of the complaining about them is hilarious, not to mention ridiculous

They're fine and if you want to contrast knowledge of and ability to play the game versus ability to describe what you are seeing in such a manner see Jiffy Davies.

Lovely fella, absolute genius on the pitch, but as far as commentary goes he's as dull as a stag do in Workington.