Since when were you a mod Latchy?

It makes me laugh that you talk of derailing threads, yet you are talking about the lock position on a full back thread. Baffling.

I've made one comment in reply to somebody that was on about the LF position, it's hardly a complete change of subject is it and I'm not pretending to be a mod just giving him some useful advice

What do you think about Mathers at Full-Back

Yea ill give you that just not sure he's up there with Brent Webb, Clint Creenshields and Brett Hodgson in what i think is a vital role within the team.

To be honest, it seems that every position on the field is becoming a key position, even the interchange players are considered 'key' in changing a game. As nice as it would be to have the league's top players in every position, sometimes you have to accept a lesser player for the strength of the rest of the team. Mathers isn't poor by any means, I'm happy with him, we could improve but we could be doing much worse. We have a committed player who the coach likes a lot, that'll do me.

Its you who changed the subject to another thread.
QUOTE...
"Its the one area of the team i would say we are weak,then again i would also say we lack a decent LF"

The post you quote me in was my first post on this thread. HTH.

Im sure Bradford at home last season he played prop, could be wrong.

Ben Harrison is not a prop, he is a loose forward. FACT.

Exactly.

Mathers is 'value for money' isn't he. You want an explosive fullback who can do special things, pay the cash, but it'll take a serious chunk of your cap. You want a bloke who'll give you 100% every day that he wakes up, and do the best he can, you get Mathers.

Reardon wasn't value for money for us. Now, on a small deal, as a winger for Bradford, I actually think he could be a decent under the radar little signing, it's all relative.

I didn't say he was but he has played it

Jesus it's like 1984 on here these days.

Doubleplusungood.

Thoughtcrime does not entail death: thoughtcrime is death