Ok, lets look at it the other way, you are the only person complaining so why should anything be changed because you say so.

Those who are unhappy always shout louder than those that are happy.

So you think its acceptable that the 'official' club website gives no coverage to the reserves or junior teams?

They dont even have a list of the reserve fixtures ffs.

All they use the website for is to try and generate turnover.

My personal opinion on this is that club officials should not post on here in their capacity as a club official. I have raised this before and got shot down, but I believe it leaves them open to criticism in events like this.

By being aware that club officials read this forum (and respond to some posts), some fans will feel that this is a valid way of getting their point across to the club.

As long as club officials post here, then I think some fans are justified in airing their issues with the club on here, whether we would prefer them to go directly to the club or not.

I originally aired my views on this, when a point about a player was clarified, yet many other rumours/posts were ignored. This could lead people to believe that there is some truth in threads if the club don't respond.

Maybe there should be no more than press releases from the club, and this forum should remain a fans forum, with issues directed to the club.

Just my opinion, and I appreciate that Greg is in a difficult position, as he tries to clarify some things for us, but I feel he may end up stitching himself/the club up.

Good point well made Dave.

Although I think all that would happen is that the club officials would come on here under a false name....ooh hang on a minute.

I think you'd have a point if the club was doing something important, like running the country for example.

At the end of the day, it's just a rugby club - which all of us are supposed to support and love "til I die" etc. Alot of posters need to just chill out and stop taking everything so seriously.

As for the original complaint about lack of Reserves/Academy info on the website - I actually agree 100%, although not at all with the manner that Panties is going about it. It's an issue I have raised privately with club officials several times and will continue to do so. Ranting about it on here is not the way to address it.

Sorry but that just proves that the club and its officials dont listen.

As ive said a million times, Greg Spruce read and understood my 'rant' but has obviously chosen to ignore it.
I cant see why I had to email him. He must be short of something to do if he wants to read the same thing over and over again.

How long does it take to post a list of ressie fixtures on the website? So far he has had over a week.

This is rlfans.com, you know a place for fans to discuss RL. It is not part of Warrington Wolves RLFC. If you have an issue with them that you would really like resolving, please, please get in touch with them. You are achieving nothing by ranting about it on here.

If only...

Seb are you for real or what?

People discuss all things Warrington Wolves RLFC on here.

Are you now saying that everyone who has issues with Jimmy Lowes, The Board, The Team, The Club should contact the club directly instead of posting it on here?

What a strange man you are.

71; is this irony?

Have you not heeded the warning.

Hope you enjoy your ban.

For real. Whearas you appear to fall neatly into the "or what" category.



Quite right. No-one is saying otherwise.



Yes and no. You see, in the real world - not some fantasy world you seem to live in - things aren't always black and white, there are grey areas. So, mostly the answer is No, of course not, most issues should be discussed on here. Such as what is wrong with the left edge defence. But sometimes, it's best to contact the club - especially when a club employee has suggested that very route. By all means, discuss the website on here and let everyone know what comes of your contact with the club.

But doing nothing other than ranting on and on about something isn't a) acheiving anything or b) interesting.



Funny isn't it, that whenever anyone disagrees with you you moan about free speech, yet when I and others post our opinions you come back with comments like that.

Test - Is the resultant outcome the direct opposite of that intended with comic effect? Answer - Nope.

Ed Byrn summed it up nicely when he was ribbing the "Isnt it ironic" song referring to a traffic jam which a town council planner was stuck in which caused the town planner to miss the meeting which was to discuss the easement of traffic congestion.

Seb, with respect again, we have already spoken privately about certain issues with regards to the manner in which you post.

You decided not to reply/comment on my feedback, which I presume means that you will continue to post in the same manner.

Im not going to get 'involved' with you as I know you are just wanting to provoke a reaction.

As promised I will post within the rules and AUP.