Putting aside whether you think the punishment does or doesn't fit the crime, if Maguire receives another similar length ban, then what's the point of paying him to spending 14ish games sat in the stand. Surely he would have to go, as there's zero possibility of the RFL changing the ban tariff in respect of such offences.

Hard to know what to make of it, to be considered by MRP next week, does that mean Leigh have registered a complaint or is the MRP just going to say NFA.

It’s now been said Leigh have provided evidence.

Something is very wrong about this, I mean why as it taken till Tuesday night to provide evidence that something was said. The game was Friday so if something was said by McGuire the proof was already there and should have been dealt with on Monday.

I’m no Columbo but I would be asking why take so long to say something I’d also be suspicious and think someone as been cohersed into corroborating a story. Just doesn’t sit right.

Due process I think. Leigh and the player(s) involved would need to decide of they wish to provide evidence, then draft a statement for the RFL and have that signed off by the legal team following the BH weekend?

Where is this info?

dependant upon Leigh providing evidence which has now happened. As such McGuire’s case will be heard next week, meaning he can play at Magic Weekend.

So, what's the comeback on Lomax for being a lying little turd who winds people up? Shame there's no punishment fit for that!

In the old days, a forward would flatten him, subdue him for the game.

I’d agree you’re no Columbo, and neither am I , but I would have assumed there’d be a motive to cohered on a complaint.
Leigh club has nothing to gain from another suspension to McGuire.

My best guess is that it is purely a moral stance from the Leigh club to support their player.

Moral stance does not constitute evidence, guess my point is why take till Tuesday to provide evidence

John 8:7

Monday was a bank holiday?