I agree, absolutely nothing doing this season unless we get lucky in the cup against Leigh and meet Hull KR on an off day at Wembley. There is no point in another away game playoff plucky loss. No, play the young squad members so they get experience and we can decide which of those will be truly good enough for 2026 and where the recruitment gaps will be. George William's contract is up end of 2026 anyway and he'll be 32 so we need to have a proven life-after-George and Sneyd plan in any case. 

I suggest now is also a time to have a clean broom on those players who are out of contract for this season. 


Toby King - a centre with pace please and ability to beat a man please. 
Rodrick Tai - ditto
Paul Vaughan -  1 year extension or thanks for the memories, our best prop but age catches up with everyone. 
Sam Powell - was just what we needed last season but I think age is catching up on him. 
Zane Musgrove -  thanks for the memories. Too little, too late fella. 
Jordan Crowther -  thanks for the memories, just not top level SL standard, down on performances from 2024, and blocking progression from the youth. 
Stefan Ratchford - thanks for the memories. I'm sure you'll be on the Wire old boys scheme somewhere. 
Connor Wrench - he's 24 this year. needs to play this season and deliver on potential and show he is over the injuries, or we should allow him to pursue opportunities elsewhere. 

We're about where we were in the better part of the Steve Price era. Nearly men who are behind the top teams but have a chance of going all the way in the Challenge Cup if we raise our game and have a bit of luck. Still doing cringeworthy insults on social media which make us look like an amateur organisation.

We just need to know what type of team we have, train we'll all week, and make an ill judged strength comparison comment on live TV and we will be all set.  

Heard Castleford wanting Vaughan 

I really don't know why people slag off Price. Two cup finals and a grand final ain't a bad return. And one of those involved stuffing saints without our (apparently) most dangerous player on the day. Unless we reach both finals this year, and win one, Price actually did better than SB. 

Yes, it's a result's business but the real disappointment for me is the optimism that we had last season is ebbing away with every knock back that we are currently experiencing.


To be clear I'm not citing knock back in a lady luck sense some of this is of our own making, better recruitment and planning aids resilience. We had built some positive momentum and didn't kick on as I'd hoped....fingers crossed we can still be in things as some troops return and the current set backs galvanise those putting on the jersey.               

First season - good progress made both finals, 2nd season CC win, but it was blowing out of the playoffs at home 3 times in a row 2019/20/21 to Castleford, Hull and Hull KR which probably left an air of disappointment. People forget this. 

Expectations were higher then I think. Seems to me a run to the final in the Challenge Cup is good enough for most now. 

Not for me! After 09,10,12 and 19 I have a bit of a "been there, done that" mentality. There's only one trophy that matters anymore. 


Funny, 14 year old me who watched us lose to Bradford at the McAlpine in that Semi in '01 would've killed for 4 Wembley wins! 

That was heartbreaking wasn't it but a few years later, 2004 onwards I guess, we found ourselves with the money, facilities, and recruitment to compete with the top teams which allowed us to raise our expectations (rightly).

Following the false dawn with a protracted Cullen period, we appointed a quality, proven coach in Tony Smith and things started to take shape. The 2009-2013 period i thought we were building into one of the dominant forces of SL, playing sublime rugby, then it sort of all went off the boil as the squad quality slowly dropped and Smith lost his way, grew a beard and started signing project players (Gary Wheeler, Ryan Bailey et al).  We had a bit of a go 2018/19 but again faded.


As of now we still have the money and facilities but not the squad or the culture/desire to win a GF. 

I always expected Price's reputation to get better with the passing of time when people forget what it was like.

If you just look in the record books, he had 4 years, got to 3 finals, won a Challenge Cup and had league finishes of 4th twice and 3rd twice. In terms of league position that's the only time apart from 2010-13 under TS that we've been top 4 for four consecutive seasons. We were garbage the year before he took over (TS last season) and we were even worse the year after he left (Powell's first). So on paper he was pretty good in the history of Wire coaches.


But that doesn't tell you the full story. It's like when you see that table of most successful England football coaches by win percentage and Fabio Capello is top. 


Price had four years but only really about one and a half where the fans were feeling good. That first year as Wires71 says was good progress given where we were the year before. Price brought better organisation and a defensive toughness. The black mark against that season was the Wembley final against Catalans when we took 20 minutes to get off the bus and the game was gone. 


Then in Price's second year we won 11 of our first 14 SL games then 5 of the last 15. That halfway point of the second year was the turning point in the whole Price era. Our Challenge Cup win came in that second half, and the win in the final against Saints was IMO the greatest 'big game' performance I've ever seen from Wire, given the occasion, the opposition, the pressure we withstood. Absolutely incredible. But a week or two after that win there were already people on here saying the Challenge Cup had 'papered over the cracks' and Price had taken us as far as he could. You could see we were in a spiral that we couldn't get out of. Blake Austin had started that season like a house on fire and was front runner for Man of Steel at the half way point then teams worked him out and that massively neutered our attack. 


The third and fourth year were a bit weird because of covid, we had a decent winning run when games restarted after the first lockdown and were played in front of empty stadiums but we never looked like we were in the calibre of Saints or Wigan or Catalans and we went down easily in the first round of the playoffs. That happened to us three times in a row and by the end we had low expectations of doing anything in the playoffs. 


The rugby wasn't very exciting under Price either but the most frustrating thing was that after half way through his second year we never looked like we had anything new. We knew when we came up against somebody good we'd fall short. We knew if we went behind in a game we wouldn't come back. We had good enough players to win more games than we lost but there was no Plan B against a team who had worked us out. 


The Cullen era was far more enjoyable than the Price era despite the results on paper not being as good. We had a few games every year where Wilderspool or the HJ was rocking and we'd win playing exciting rugby against a top team. We never had any memorable moments under Price apart from that backs to the wall win at Wembley. 

In terms of the Price era it looked to me that the players performed in some games despite SP and not because of him. I can never really forgive him for allowing the signing of Luther Burrell. I appreciate he may not have instigated it but he could have prevented it. 


In terms of this year. We heard before the season started that Burgess mentioned a transition year. I don't know how true that was but I thought it it was true I was looking forward to seeing more of Green, Thomas, Whitehead or even Harthill as a look towards the future. Not too sure what Max Wood did wrong in his recent spell in the team unless he picked up an injury. it will be interesting to see how we cope without Williams. When you look at Wigan last year had about an 8 game spell with both French and Field missing they managed to keep picking up results. I mean might be wrong but just can't see that happening here. 
Burgess' demeanour had definitely changed. Looks like he is trying to turn into his mentor (Wayne Bennett). 


Defensively we have big lapses that just weren't there last year. We beat Saints with 11 men on the pitch last year. If that happened now most teams would stick 50 on us. I think we miss Nicholson more than we probably thought we would and Russell is no replacement. 
In attack we hear how Martin Gleeson is a genius but I am just not seeing it. Apart from the big shift play with Dufty on the end or individual brilliance from Williams I just don't see much variety in attack. Last year we had little plays through the middle with Walker, Williams and Dufty combining against tired middles but have seen very little of that. Against Hull last week their big blokes (Herman, Assiata, Ashworth) had done big minutes and was perfect for picking them off down the middle but we just didn't spot it. 
It looks like we are low on confidence and when that happens individuals try and win the game on their own.  But confidence players like Dufty go into their shell a bit. The way to regain the confidence is if your defence is solid. Last year our goal line defence was up their with the best in the league but now we only need to give away a penalty or drop a ball and handover possession and if a team has a set or two in our 20 I am not confident in keeping them out. 


So a bit like my school reports. If he applies himself he could get a job driving a van but lacks concentration and easily distracted. 

Excellent post. Spot on with the analysis of the first 18 months vs the last 30 months. In that latter period you just knew we were not of the standard to win the title or even compete in the pressure games and you just had to wait until the board realised that too. In the end they just let his contract run out. Dull rugby and no hope of winning the prize.  I think the players also chose their games then too.  

The truth is that Price was just not very good. He got sacked from st george Illawarra after 2 years  losing 2/3rds of his games, then a whole 4 years with us and that was the end of his head coaching career. His results in the final 2 1/2 years were poor and so was his legacy in terms of squad and young player progression. 


We should have sacked him after blowing out of the playoffs at home, in identical circumstances for a 2nd time running in September 2020. This isn't hindsight as I said the same at the time.