I’ll leave mine in there then.
Underwhelmed. I couldn’t stand the home 1990 ish type with the greenalls logo that was uglier than this big red hoover button.

If they're made out of that awful shiny, sweaty, uncomfortable material, then I won't buy one regardless of how aesthetically pleasing they may be.

Home one is ok, will probably grow on me. Away one is just naff.

I quite like the away one, it's just a pity there is no option to buy without the logo.

Not that I would ever buy one (or like to see it crossing the whitewash at the DW) but I think both are really good kits

The away shirt is actually starting to grow on me. It's not a traditional Wire top in any way, but I think it might look quite smart on match day. Probably not on my puny physique though.

I would’ve loved a replica shirt when I was a teenager, just can’t bring myself to wear one in my dotage. Have bought them for others mind.
Think both shirts are ok, the away looks more like a casual polo shirt than a rugby shirt though.

Interesting as I grew up in the 80s watching the wire and from what I remember the home kits used to be white with primrose and blue and the away kits blue with primrose and white. I've always like a predominantly white home kit. Guess it's just about options though and if you like them and can afford you'll buy it if not you won't

Among all the advertising splurge about the new Kit ,the word "fungible" was mentioned . Can somebody tell me what "fungible" means please before i start trying to grow mushrooms in my new shirt.

I feel we don't really have an identity with kits really due to how many variations we have had. I'd love us to just settle on variations of primrose and blue hoops or stripes etc personally. I suppose the first kits I saw us in being the greenalls Mike Gregory era pnb hoops and white and green away are the kits I associate with as they're the first kits I remember, everyone will have different views on this with so many kit varieties through the years. Our colours are listed as primrose and blue though and they're my personal preference. Each to their own I guess.

Don’t know much about economics, but the way I understand Fungible Commodities is that one has the same value whatever form it’s presented in. So if you melt your nylon wire top down at the end of the season into small ingots shaped as coins, you should technically be able to use them to pay for the next season’s shirt?

I have to say it’s a great idea. It’ll replace crypto. Who wants to buy shares in WireTopCoin?

Thanks easywire, So ,basically, it doesn't depreciate in value.

Blimey, call me old fashioned but I struggle with the concept that 'cash is no longer king' particularly when told that I can't exchange it for something so simple as a pint of beer

Quote: ninearches "Thanks easywire, So ,basically, it doesn't depreciate in value.'" It's a Non Fungible Token though ... Here is a decent guide. It's an immutable ledger that proves ownership of digital media https://www.economist.com/the-economist ... -is-an-nft Relies on the same block chain technology that has half of Kazakhstan burning coal to power bitcoin miners... https://www.newscientist.com/article/22 ... inese-ban/

Quote: ninearches "Thanks easywire, So ,basically, it doesn't depreciate in value.'" It's a Non Fungible Token though ... Here is a decent guide. It's an immutable ledger that proves ownership of digital media https://www.economist.com/the-economist ... -is-an-nft Relies on the same block chain technology that has half of Kazakhstan burning coal to power bitcoin miners... https://www.newscientist.com/article/22 ... inese-ban/

Wires 71 ,completely confused now ,head in bits ! Thanks for the effort though .