Clarke/Briers would probably work quite well if Briers had his creative head on. If the pack is dominant, then Clarke's kicks downfield/into the corner would be very effective.

Our halves didn;t talk to each other & barely looked at one another. One thing you teach kids from year dot is not to stand too flat & not to take the ball stood still.

Every pass between the 2 halves was direct at the man who then had to build the attack momentum again from a standing start. It wasn't going to happen. And the other thing was that when the backs attacked (especially Penny unfortunately) the wings were running lines 6-10m away from touch. We played a very compressed game.

I think the best thing Bridge can do to advance his chances of getting into the Warrington starting 13 is to develop an Australian accent.

Clarke has been good in the recent past but please don't make him kick. Higham could easily fill that role but we should really have at least 2 proper kickers at the club (Bridge if he plays?). Clarke isn't a great kicker, and this is not a critism because that should not be his role

How good is Hick's in-game kicking? To be honest I can't really ever remember seeing him doing tactical kicking.

Pretty difficult from the wing isn't it.

NO HE IS NOT.

Sorry Lefty but you are deluded.

I dont think I've ever seen Higham kick a ball, when you play alongside Sean long and paul sculthorpe at Saints and Trent barret at wigan it would be a very rare occurance that he needed to kick....

Clarke has in fact produced kicks of a quality better than monaghan but the thought of Clarke doing something better than another rugby player doesnt sit well with the majority on here so its no suprise that all and sundry are suggested as different options for kickers over Clarke

I agree...........

You are, he has played the majority of his career at half back and has been excellent at it. Your just making stuff up.

Its my opinion Lefty lad.

I watched him extensively in his last season at Manly where he played at Hooker for the majority of the games.

He was awsome at Hooker for Manly and was one of the main reasons why they made the GF against Melbourne.

He has been a shadow of his former self whilst playing in the halves for Wire.

At the very least we should give it a go and see what happens.

This wreaks of Michael Sullivan

Unfortunately it does and everyone remembers what happened when Sullivan went back to Hooker, he was immense.

Its a shame the club didn't learn lessons from the Sullivan affair.

Not if he goes back to full back and I was only curious