If he's not seen the ball on the grass(which he hadn't!)how the f@#k can he send it up as a try? As soon as he sends it up as a try we all know it's being given.

Why should we avoid the forwards? We mullered the all conquering Hull pack tonight. The myth is that our pack is the problem, which it isnt. Our pack does it's job, the halfbacks don't.

Poor game management by Wire, to give another six on the 5th tackle 5m out when we were leading by 4 points.

The six again was an extremely soft call.

lads he said he believed he grounded it, just wanted to chk, ref does this all the time, it was a try

And he saw the ball on the ground then?

Exactly. Avoid doing this and we likely win the game.

So did our player's hand underneath just magically disappear then?

the ref saw the ball grounded but not on the first movement,player is still allowed to wriggle and place the ball down, he wanted to double chk if hed lost it before, it happens all the time . refs are always checking to cover there backs, TBH draw wouldnt have been a bad result,

Mate, several camera angles never saw the ball grounded. I accept the rule and as soon as it goes up as 'try' it's going to be given no matter what. That's why it needs to be changed

You have literally just made all of that up. None of that happened.

Wait till this happens to saints..mcmoanalot..sorry McManus will be crying for this rule to be changed and fast

In Australia, isnt it correct, if there is a referral to the VR and he thinks the pitch ref has pre called it incorrectly but is unable to change the decision within the VR guidelines, the VR can refer it back to the pitch ref to make a call?

I can understand your frustration but haaving been screwed over by Kendall on numerous occasions we're happy to take his call. No doubt you, and probably every other team have been both benefactor and victim of this man's erratic refereeing but as others have said, no action will be taken against him.