totally echo those sentiments ste.took my lad for the 1st time and he really enjoyed the day.no trouble and the leeds we spoke to were a real credit to there club..again a fantastic day one that will live long in the memory...p.s thanks for everything yesterday ste well organised and had a real laugh especially young charlie leading the singing..stroll on grand final

Top performance by Warrington today and well deserved.
Shame about the Delaney no try as it might have made the game more competitive but these things happen.
Hats off to Briers who got some stick from the fans and takes it with good humour unlike a certain player from Wigan.
As for someone stating class shows in the end.
Quite right and we certainly need to start putting our hands in our pockets as it proves money can buy success

Didn't see the game as I was too busy winning my own national final, but congratulations Wire.

What puzzles me about that incident is how Leeds got a scrum out of it...the ref was clearly heard talking to the VR about a mistake being made as to whose scrum it was when in the first instance the scrum was given to Warrington then given to Leeds. As we know the tackle was deemed to be fair by the VR, so if there was no offside, according to the VR, & no Leeds knock on it was a perfectly good try.

from a wigan fan

congratulations best team won on the day ,had a great weekend well done

Why are folk still debating the Delaney No-Try? The rules are really quite straightforward, and its easy to surmise the ref's call:

Fair tackle --> Hodgson spills ball (1st knock on) --> Leuluai fumbles ball (2nd knock on) --> Scrum Attack (Leeds ball)

Delaney's offside doesn't even enter into it. The only confusion I see is the screen saying Scrum Defence and Silverpud awarding Scrum Attack, thus changing the judging (quite correctly). Here endeth the lesson.

We had the ball so Leeds were defending, Scrum Defence was the correct decision on the screen. All pretty clear cut and a little irritating that much of the media is reporting the incident as if Leeds were denied a legitimate try.

Yep. Language be a funny bugger - spot on.

I agree with both the above, it seems uninformed comment plus people that have not seen the replay of the incident.

And in any case, it would have made no difference to the result if a try had been allowed. Leeds simply didn't have the belief, the game plan or the personnel out there to win.

The Ratchford effort should have been a try.

Hodgson knocks on 1st

Finally someone picked up on that, yes it should of been there was no knock on anywhere in the build..