Hull FC were the Hull Sharks at the start of SL era were they not?

Bazinga,

and although it is not an animal, Hudds are the giants, and before that they were the Sheffield Eagles.

That's why I said 'almost every', smart . Plus, you just got served by Biff!



EDIT: I said a-r-s-e, not 'booty'. Stupid swear filter making me look incestuous...

Well he accounted for 2 out of 5 I suppose....

well wigan adopted the warriors and salford the ty i mean city reds, and well st helens just went with saints and that stupid flaming stick figure with a halo and rugby ball.

5/5

Not animals though, I'm afraid.

ah but saints have got st bernard!

Really? how shocking, i can't believe i never mentioned it before.




I wish you would have been there to teach me what was an animal and what isn't.

I don't want to start tension but why did you mention it then?

You were just saying 'I know this isn't relevant but I can name all the teams in super league'

We were referring to teams named after animals and wigan, sts and huddersfield aren't. It is that simple! No 5/5 rubbish. You might has well have told us what you had for dinner.

I believe at one point that Warrington were rumoured to be contemplating Warrington Sharks when there were loose talks of a tie-up with Sale RU.

No he wasn't, he just named the teams that weren't animals. Nothing awkward about it.

No, the original point was that since the intro of SL that each team adopted an animal or figure to go with their team, and someone pointed out the teams without animals, yet i pointed out that although they didn't have animals they had adopted something else instead. It's that simple.

You say that i may as well have told you what i had for dinner, but your post about those not being animals was just another you have made to add an extra post to the inane drivel you usually give us.




She's on her period mark, just trying to nit pick at every opportunity.