Anyway, I am hearing he hasn't in fact let his passport lapse. It is something quite different. It rhymes with popped.

youtu.be/k3aH7RtVSLI

youtu.be/k3aH7RtVSLI

Seen that happen and saved it from happening to a few too.

Price has gone right up in my estimations for finally dropping the show pony.

It's a pity Jason Clark jack Hughes charnleys passports haven't run out

Probably from a few daft young lads, who don't know responsibility.

From a highly paid professional, representing a professional sports club. I'm not so sure.


Unless the whole "story" is a wind up

On hindsight, I was hoping for Jason Clark being barred entry to England 3 years ago, for having Rolf Harris records in his luggage.

Best for all concerned

One thing wrong in how many years? Not bad. Btw we wanted him at the time, he changed his mind and turned us down. It happens.

On Austin the club have been asked the question and said ‘no comment’ to the Warrington Guardian. Why not just deny it if is not true then?

The club take a "no comment" stance when they're not prepared to enter a yes and no game based on media speculation.

"Why not deny it?" - because next time they're asked a different question they'll be expected to "answer" that, and so on, and whilst media promotion is encouraged, running the internal affairs of your club through the media isnt perhaps so great.

With respect, absolute nonsense. If you’re asked a question that is simply not true and a 100% made up internet rumour, you deny it profoundly.

Maybe Austin's massive ego prefers the passport story to being dropped and has asked the club to stick with that one

Maybe the club's poet laureate wasn't available to provide such a profound response.

This is where you fail to understand the media.

If you say "no" their follow up question would then be "So how long is left on Austin's passport, which other players passports expire and when, (or maybe even, is Wane going to be you're next manager, if not who is..)..etc"

It gives them scope to dig for a story that started perhaps from a made up nothing, whilst a "no comment" shuts it down by giving a clear signal that you're not prepared to engage any further.

There is a difference however, when people use "no comment" when presented with some clear evidence, where it might be actually beneficial to say something else.

Beginning to sound like an episode of the Bill ,innit ?

or "UK Border Force...." but, more often that not with these 'sources' it's , "Jackanory".