Im not sure how this confirms he did not have a clause in his contract?

You haven't got the foggiest about Glees, or RL in general given your appearances on here.

Gleeson has done very well for us, his 'supa' Saints form is a myth, his under performing here is a myth (barr a ropey by his own standards 2006).

As i've said, next year, I think he'll be superb.

We finished outside the top 6.....

Oh never mind, you're just being silly now

"but recovered to play a pivotal role in Great Britain's Test series win over New Zealand. "

Started all three tests.

And?

and played fairly well in all 3. Was quiet on Saturday but was good in the first 2 tests.

So, he played a pivotal role didn't he. If he'd only played in say 1, or a couple of sub appearances, he'd have been on the periphary.

Given the number of players that played in the series, what with players 'rested' & dropped, he must have done something right.

It doesn't matter though does it 'dredd', your blinkered hatred of Glees' goes before anything.

Pivotal-'Being of vital or central importance; crucial' and that describes Gleeson in the tests does it?

Todays made up fact.

A Warrington fan slagging off one of his own is bad enough, but slagging off one of his own that happens to be one of the best centres in the world....

Either that or you aren't a Warrington fan, in that case, your opinion means about as much as Graham Appo

No it isn't. He's always the person you 'attack'. (In the loosest sense.)

So looking at a players performance objectivily is slagging him off? I happen to believe that you don't have to take a blinkered view of a team to be a fan.

I assure i do not have a "blinkered hatred of Glees'", so yes it is a made up fact.

Well the stand out moment of the tests for me was Gleeson's pass out to Ade Gardner at Hull, which is a classic example of his main quality. He didn't make many, if any mistakes, so yes, he did play a very important role in the 3 tests, as did anyone else who played in all 3 games.

Gleeson is probably one of our most consistent players of 2007, so instead of looking to find a bad point, start to realise that a 2 year extension of his contract is nothing but a good thing.

Okay whatever.

I just wonder why the hell then at every mention of the bloke, your like a broken record going on about his under performances. If we listened to you, he's been crap for us for 4 years and poor for GB.

Out of the two centres playing for Gb, senior made a far far bigger contribution in attacks than gleeson did who had a 'steady' 3 games.
As far as his 2 year extension goes, i'm glad we are keeping him, i just hope we are paying a 'reasonable wage'

I've never said any of that.

I agree with the Wigan fans.

Gleeson is poop and they must be delighted there is no chance he is going there. King is paid half of our total wage bill and is vastly over-rated. Add to that Chris (who?) Hicks who doesn't even make it onto an online poll and the lightweight one season wonder Kev Penny and you can see how poor our backs are going to be next season.

I wish we had Wigan's outside backs instead.

There's always two sides though Judge. Far more ball went left did it not. I thought Gleeson was effective without being brilliant. Defensively he was very good.

95% of the attack went down the GB left side, its the polar opposite of how warrington play, and the only reason people are saying he had a bad game the other day is because of that pass he put down when he was in the gap, however its possibly only the 2nd pass he did get all game so it stands out more, and it was a bad pass.

Top tackler in the backs over the 3 tests I believe

Couldn't have been that bad then

That pass was coming mightily fast aswell, I think most people would have dropped it at that speed

Tbh i think senior is just quicker and stronger than gleeson, he probably did get more better ball than gleeson but he also used his strength to break attempted tackles, it's been awhile since i've seen gleeson use those 'quick feet' . Yes he is good defensivly.

So he was'nt pivotal to the test series win then?