FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Warrington Wolves > McGuire
308 posts in 22 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
RankPostsTeam
Moderator39717
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


Quote: Lord Tony Smith "https://www.rugby-league.com/governance/rules-and-regulations/disciplinary/disciplinary-case?case
Its not easy reading that, a few thoughts, yes it is charnley vs mcguires word..
As mentioned above, it seems distasteful that charnley would use something like that, but we do know he's also a gobe that tried to get people in trouble. And based on what happened last time, mcguire made himself something of an easy target, some sticks.

However, we come again to a repeat of what happened last time, where mcguire said he didn't do it, couldn't possibly have done it and tried to sell them on his character rather than actual details of thr altercation.

What's quite telling this time, the lack of club input some might argue bare minimum, as we went in all guns blazing last time to try and prove his innocence.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5510
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



This discussion seems to be getting out of hand.

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner6724No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200421 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: ninearches "This discussion seems to be getting out of hand.'"

Does it?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach8991
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Jun 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



So I've read the report and I can see why the panel have sided with charnley.

A decent lawyer would have briefed the defendant better in how to defend such an allegation. Where as it appears McGuire had been left to his own defence and essentially did not make a credible defence.

However, I've no knowledge of what he said on either occasion but 12 games is a hell of a ban.

I've no dog in the fight as a Saints fan but 12 games for an offensive comment seems excessive. Especially when you take into account the background of most players probably being from a culture and era where insults would have been common place.

Its easy in the heat of battle to lose civility and slip into old habits and use a less civil tongue or indeed come to blows. I agree a ban is needed but 12 matches seems punitive, what would the outcome be in another workplace?

Maybe next time just punch the guy rather than use your mouth.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2845
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



What defence is McGuire supposed to put up other than denying he said it?

Balance of probabilities I think it’s likely he did, but likely is a very dangerous precedent.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9885No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Fantastic Mr Catpiss "Its not easy reading that, a few thoughts, yes it is charnley vs mcguires word..
As mentioned above, it seems distasteful that charnley would use something like that, but we do know he's also a gobe that tried to get people in trouble. And based on what happened last time, mcguire made himself something of an easy target, some poop sticks.

However, we come again to a repeat of what happened last time, where mcguire said he didn't do it, couldn't possibly have done it and tried to sell them on his character rather than actual details of thr altercation.

What's quite telling this time, the lack of club input some might argue bare minimum, as we went in all guns blazing last time to try and prove his innocence.'"

I’m not McGuire’s biggest fan by any means and I’d be more than happy if we shipped him back to Oz on the back of this however it does seem harsh that a player reports McGuire has said something abusive however there’s no witnesses and zero evidence other than McGuire’s lips moving and McGuire still cops such a ban. Don’t get me wrong if he has said what has been reported then throw the book at him. I’d want him sacked today but without evidence and one persons claim I would have thought it would have been quite severe to give out such a hefty ban, if any.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach17283
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Lord Tony Smith "https://www.rugby-league.com/governance/rules-and-regulations/disciplinary/disciplinary-case?case
No is isn’t. It’s the credibility of JC and the proven untruthful nature from JMcG in the first disciplinary, in addition, to the ‘one word against another’.

If JMcG had told the whole truth in the first discipline, he may have had a chance with ‘his word against mine’ in the second hearing, but he hadn’t.

So you must take the credibility of Charnley as reason above doubt against McGuire.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach17283
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: bewareshadows "So I've read the report and I can see why the panel have sided with charnley.

A decent lawyer would have briefed the defendant better in how to defend such an allegation. Where as it appears McGuire had been left to his own defence and essentially did not make a credible defence.

However, I've no knowledge of what he said on either occasion but 12 games is a hell of a ban.

I've no dog in the fight as a Saints fan but 12 games for an offensive comment seems excessive. Especially when you take into account the background of most players probably being from a culture and era where insults would have been common place.

Its easy in the heat of battle to lose civility and slip into old habits and use a less civil tongue or indeed come to blows. I agree a ban is needed but 12 matches seems punitive, what would the outcome be in another workplace?

Maybe next time just punch the guy rather than use your mouth.'"

Absolutely just punch them.
Police will not get involved.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2972
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2023Jun 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



It's probable that I'll get a ban for this post, but here goes anyway (it's a forum and we're all adults, after all):

It seems that McGuire has twice now used the word spastic, or some diminutive of this.

Which is, these days, an offensive term.

If Josh Charnley's son has cerebral palsy, then McGuire has used an old-fashioned, now very pejorative, term to state a fact. It's not very nice by any stretch, and he deserves calling out on it.

If Josh Charnley's son doesn't have cerebral palsy, and is autistic as has been suggested, then McGuire has used an old-fashioned, pejorative term inaccurately. Again, it's not nice, and he deserves calling out on it.

In either scenario, Charnley appears to have taken offence at the word used by McGuire. Which is understandable, but this isn't a war crime FFS.

The capacity for people to be offended in this day and age seems to get greater almost by the minute.

Having said all this, McGuire has a fairly long rap sheet in the past, so it's not looking like he was a very sensible signing all told.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach17283
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: worthing wire "It's probable that I'll get a ban for this post, but here goes anyway (it's a forum and we're all adults, after all)
By your own admission you don’t know…so why in heavenly name say that?

His son doesn’t have cerebral palsy!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach8019No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Silly lover should've covered his mouth, like these [iclever[/i footballers do, then said "prove I said something naughty". If there's no corroborating evidence via microphone, then he should be entitled to launch an appeal.

Simple truth is, he's been ####ing useless when he's put his Wire kit on, and rubber duckie should drive him to the airport, free of charge, because he's a wage thief















McGuire
Not duckie

RankPostsTeam
International Star3853
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2023Sep 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: ratticusfinch "What defence is McGuire supposed to put up other than denying he said it?

Balance of probabilities I think it’s likely he did, but likely is a very dangerous precedent.'"


Pretty much my thoughts.

What I would say is that if McGuire is totally convinced of his innocence (a big if), then he should have found himself a good lawyer by now and made sure he's going to appeal, because any half decent lawyer would tear that case apart in a court of law.

I mean, disgruntled ex-employee goes after valuable asset of his former employer, with accusation that nobody else has heard - I don't think the CPS would be sending that to court.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach17283
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



You’re kidding right, the foul duck would want a big slice of his severance to listen to his foul mouth!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach17283
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: lefty goldblatt "Silly lover should've covered his mouth, like these [iclever[/i footballers do, then said "prove I said something naughty". If there's no corroborating evidence via microphone, then he should be entitled to launch an appeal.

Simple truth is, he's been ####ing useless when he's put his Wire kit on, and rubber duckie should drive him to the airport, free of charge, because he's a wage thief

McGuire
Not duckie'"


The wage thief I can let go…but I’m taken back by you calling me “ducking useless”!

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner6724No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200421 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Again the ability to understand what statement an inclusive sport being lenient on disability discrimination would have goes straight over some peoples head. Yeah let's just call black players the N word and gays queer, no harm is there icon_rolleyes.gif

308 posts in 22 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
308 posts in 22 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


11.064453125:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
11m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Rugby Raider
4042
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
7s
Film game
karetaker
5733
19s
Ground Improvements
Trojan Horse
188
20s
Rumours and signings v9
[Gareth]
28897
27s
Shopping list for 2025
hull2524
5586
30s
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63258
1m
Planning for next season
Bent&Bon
184
1m
Salford
karetaker
52
1m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2607
1m
Transfer Talk V5
Jack Burton
508
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
4
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
Jack Burton
4
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Trojan Horse
36
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
karetaker
52
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
FIL
50
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
1035
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
636
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1363
England's Women Demolish The W..
1190
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1428
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1210
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1472
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
2009
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2218
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2460
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
2025
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2266
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2733
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2157
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2234