Although he was in their 2005 Grand Final winning side, I believe it was the signing of Iestyn Harris that led to the club's demise.

Ya know everytime we go to bradford i get jittery,
i always think we are going to be on the wrong end of a drubbing,
but last night made a change,yes bradford was poor,
but you can only beat what is in front of you...........

That first try after half time was like a scene out of "the keystone cops."..

Bradford seem to have a similar predicament with Paul Deacon as we have with Lee Briers.

If he plays he isn't as good as he was and gets abuse. If he doesn't play, there isn't anyone to put in a half decent kicking game for the team.

PS - Well done LB for the performance last night, rolling back the years

or did we make em look bad???????

If that is the case, then there has been a lot of teams making them look bad

get your point but nobody has put that many points on them and certainly not leeds

Only Warrington fans would push the angle of how poor the opposition were as oppose to crediting their team. I don't know how some folk on here get through life, tiny things must be a trauma, supa hot day,you buy a bloody can of coke, drink it, it quenshes your thirst, then look on the back,

'If you are not fully satisfied with this product, please write to the following address within 14 days'.

Dear Coca Cola,

I enjoyed my fizzy, bubble filled cola drink, but didn't feel fully satisfied. My dissatisfaction stems from the fact that I enjoyed the drink because I was thirsty, and not that the coca cola was refreshing. With this in mind, please refund my 52p to the following back account.

Bradford were very very poor, it would be ludicrous to suggest otherwise, but equally it was a very similar Bradford team to the one that beat Leeds and ran Wakey very close. I think it's right that we take a lot of the credit for destroying them at sOdall, but we shouldn't start thinking that we have 'turned the corner' and are going to start surging up the league.

IMO our next three league games (Hudds at home, Rovers in Edinburgh then Hull away) will give a far better indication of how much, if at all, we have improved.

Bradford were poor, we were good. That simple.

bradford were poor cos wire made them look poor ,they had no ball and no one knows how that feels more than us .lets give credit to the boys when we had the ball this week we put points on the board .we got in there faces and bashed them .they beat leeds last game so they not that bad eh .for god sake we won and played well sick of how bad they were and if they would have had this and that .warrington played realy well end of lets enjoy the moment

I'm not one for stats, and I think its more of a term used in Tennis, but what was Bradford's 'unforced errors' total?...

Yes, you then have to capitalise on these errors, and we certainly did that well, but to those suggesting that it was our play that forced the errors might be a bit misleading.

That opening try of the second half was a classic example...it was 100% the fault of a Bradford cock-up and had balls-all to do with any Wire pressure.....Similarly, Hicks' hat-trick try, when one of their guys knocks on in junior school style, Briers picks up and feeds Hicks, and Bradford's defence parts like the Red Sea...



Yes, we jumped on their errors, but a lot of our points were gifted and required little effort to score.

I'd say 90% brainfart and 10% the wire chase and quick reactions of Higham to get to the ball first