Don't quite understand the comment. Which part are you taking offence at? Explain please.
Why are you sending me personal messages and then deleting them?

Really speaking , both Saints & Wigan have some type of culture whereby when players and/or coaches are replaced the broad success continues from one season to the next. Saints last season had a poor season, by their standards , but still managed to reach the play offs.
Is that a great culture at both those clubs or maybe highlights the lack of continuity within the rest of superleague ?

I think we have moved on by the number of youngsters we have played (with success) this last year. This probably has something to do with Chambers ... but it might just be a bit of luck.

First point - one man could have changed Warrington. Shaun Wane. But we chose Powell.

Second point - I suspect our fans are [umuch more tolerant [/uthan those of Wigan or Saints. We tolerate the ridicule of "always our year" and most fans don't expect GF wins. Those clubs' standards are far higher as are their fans expectations. You call it fickle - I wouldn't use that word. The low points of both clubs are not too far off our high points of the last 5 years too.

When did you last see Wigan or Saints end a season narrowly avoiding relegation and keeping their coach? Or a Saints or Wigan side losing 3 home playoffs in a row? When do you ever hear a Wigan or Saints player use the phrase "there or thereabouts".

It's a different culture and mindset.

In terms of "judging success" Wigan are the current benchmark.

Totally with you that Wigan are the benchmark. We will never know what Shaun Wane would have done ... not even sure he wanted the job.

Course he didn't! He gets to contest two games a year as England coach then swan around like the king of Wigan sitting next to Peet at the pie dome!

Shaun Wane was never the solution on his own. That's why he called the Warrington job 'a poisoned chalice'... He isn't the reason behind the Wigan culture, he's a symptom of it and also an important cog in it. There are a plethora of reasons that make up the winning culture at Wigan (including the stream of local talent) and if we want to emulate that here it has to start from the top down. Hopefully we are starting to see that high salaries, big paydays for past-it players and catty social media is not a recipe for success on the field.

The appointment of Burgess will no doubt help on the field, and the current crop of local young talent will hopefully be the shoots of a new ethos within the club. It's important that we maintain that mindset going forward of having players that will put their body on the line for the club when the chips are down, rather than a coffee-shop culture where everything is peachy and the players just plod on regardless, thinking about their next latte on Monday morning at training.

The danger is when Burgess leaves and a new coach comes in, and we trust them with yet another big culture change.

I think that's where the appointment of chambers comes into its own, it will be his responsibility to ensure the work we are doing now at all levels are the same throughout so the previous three years of work is still relevant at first team level, the appointment of a new head coach will be based on how we work and operate as a club not on their individual achievements previously. As mentioned above Wigan are the benchmark without doubt but they appointed a relative unknown head coach in Peet and he's worked wonders within keeping that club winning mentality because all the coaching staff at all levels work to the same standards and that most probably comes from Radlinski ensuring the right people are in the right place

Decent post and good points although I'm not sure that any blame can be laid at coffee.

I'm hoping that when Burgess eventually does leave, we won't be heading for a "big culture change". You see it in now Association Football and at the successful RL clubs, the system is set as you say yourself "from the top down" and the coach comes in playing with the cards that are being dealt to him largely by the club's hierarchy.

Rollercoaster management is bad for business, it's usually expensive and doesn't guarantee success, well certainly not the long term legacy sustainable type, which is what we need to aim for as it's vital in a financially constrained sport such as ours.

The standards are set at the top and run through everything they do. People like the following:

1. Radlinski (GB, England international)
2. Wane (multiple GF winner as coach)
3. O'Loughlin (GB, England international, multiple GF winner)

ensure that continuity. If Peet leaves - they remain.

When Burgess leaves we will have

1. Fitzpatrick
2. Chambers
3. Gleeson (GB, England international, multiple GF winner)
4. Marshall

Exactly, the standards are set and remain within the club. Rather than the standards are set at the top and run through everything they do i think at a club like Wigan the standards are set at the under 16s and run through to the first team, every single one of them first team players know there are ten lads with the desire to take that first team spot away from them so the standards are set from the bottom up

1. Radlinski (GB, England international)
2. Wane (multiple GF winner as coach)
3. O'Loughlin (GB, England international, multiple GF winner)

The hierarchy at Wigan are all ex-Wigan. They haven't suddenly gone shopping for "outsiders". They have trusted their own. When Peet was given the coaching job most from outside of Wigan said who?
I'm afraid there are no easy answers for doing similar at Wire.