Are we allowed to say that these days ???????

Miles away from Saints and Leeds. To suggest otherwise is exceptionally dumb.

In the days when Sky are telling us it's the closest league for years, it must be a bit of a bugger for Saints to be running away with everything.

Championship form as you put means that your beating champions on a regular basis, thats i how view it anyway. We are on a very good run at the minute and Tony Smith has instilled some steel and a winning mentallity into this club, the next step is to be beating the likes of Leeds and Saints on a regular basis as they are the benchmark.

We are heading in the right direction but its nothing to get carried away with just yet, i still believe it will take Tony Smith at least 3 years to shape his own squad as their will be quite a few players that he inherited where he may feel that they are not upto the job. Anything before then will be a bonus in my opinion.

No it doesn't, how could you beat champions on a regular basis?

we will trust me.....

Have a day off will ya, what are Leeds Rhinos ? If you answer they are the current SL champions and we then go on to beat them in the league, who would we be beating ?

Would it be the current champions by any chance ?

Lets say Saints win the grand final this year and we beat them in the league next year, who would we be beating ?

Thats called beating champions on a regular basis which we fail to do.

let them say that....i said a few days on here saints and leeds will not contest the final...believe me..one of these will cock up

if we absolutely funukin batter Saints then im buying my ticket for OT the same day it's that simple

We beat the champions last year? and have a chance to do so this year? We also beat Leeds in 2005(when they were champs also), we have also beaten Bradford when they have been champs. Showing championship form is exactly what Wires71 said, form that would win you the championship, easy really.

Thats not beating champions on a regular basis is it, i would hardly call beating a weakened Leeds team last year and beating them back in 2005 something that happens on a regular basis,

To finish top of SL we would have to beat Saints and probably Leeds as well, can you tell me when the last time we beat Saints was and when was the last time we beat both Saints and Leeds in the same season ?

All i`m saying here is we shouldn`t be getting carried away just yet just like Tony Smith won`t be getting carried away either, its a good run of results but its not like we are beating either Leeds or Saints is it and thats the benchmark like i said above.

Okay, so it's only championship form if you beat the champions? So if a team is top of the league and not beaten the current champions then they're not in championship form? Don't talk crap Rob. How can you be in any position to judge our form anyway?

Seems like another one of your backtracks Rob, I totally agree with the above statement but the original point was is that our current form is that of a champion side, which statistically is true.

Meaning what exactly ? This is coming from one of the people that was telling us for years that Paul Cullen was the man to take us forward, how can anyone take anything you say serious after that little gem.

The second anyway questioned Paul Cullen`s inabilities to take us forward on here we were shot down in flames by the likes of you, like i said, have a day off.



Its not backtracking on anything, i said the same earlier in the thread that we shouldn`t be getting carried away with the recent run of results and that beating Saints and Leeds on a regular basis is the benchmark.

You talk total and utter poop and you make it up as you go along, you obviously can`t read either.

I never said anywhere that Richie Myler is not SL class, a thread was started by someone else before the season started and i said on that thread that we need to see how Richie Myler goes in SL as he may or may not be SL class as all his form was in a lower division, thats a natural thing for anyone to say about a National League 1 player entering SL.

Nowhere did i say he wasn`t SL class and you know it, i`m sure you just like to make stuff up for the sake of it.

Just to help you along with some facts of what i actually said and not the made up rubbish you posted, here is what i actually said about Richie Myler which was before he had made his SL debut, what i said was logical about a player stepping up from NL1 as you never know until they have played SL whether they will handle the step up or not hence me saying he MAY or may NOT turn out to be SL class, nowhere did i say he wouldn`t make the step up.



As for Matt King, in the main he has been a poor centre for us, shocking at times, a lot of his best form came on the wing which was hardly suprising. Tell me what quality right sides he has been up against of late ?

He was signed on big money to be the answer to our left centre problems, apart from the odd good game against poor opposition he has been shocking as a centre, Hull arn`t exactly a team in form either.

Like i said have a day off and check your facts about before psoting drivel.