I'd buy one

Leeds could have an Emmerdale themed shirt whilst wearing flat caps and wellies and instead of a water carrier they could have a Yorkshire tea carrier

Would it have Louie McCarthy-Scarsbrook's face on it? I'm guessing we would all want one of those!

It’s a pain for those of us who collect shirts! I’m still after last year’s Thor one as I didn’t get it at the time: I’ll pay £40 for any size, or £50 for a small. Drop me a PM.

Will probably have to buy an Ant Man one straight off this year, to save the hassle later of trying to get one on eBay or whatever. But it is both terrible and ridiculous. If only idiots like me didn’t buy them...

I only buy a shirt I like. So the last I bought was the A Johns chevron white.

I've just seen it.

I had my mind cast back about 30 years, to the days of Grange Hill's Zammo Maguire

JUST SAY NO

What a load of shyite. It’s been done twice now (one in the NRL and once at last year’s Magic), the fad has had its day. Since the club/ISC won’t have us in traditional Wire colours for proper kits, why not put us in a proper traditional Wire kit for Magic?https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/sport-rugby-league-pic-may-1950-the-warrington-captain-harry-bath-is-picture-id78947076" >
(Shirts-Primrose and blue hoops, white collar; white shorts; primrose and blue hoop socks)

Do it like a proper old-school throw back kit. Like United did for a derby oncehttps://talksport.com/sites/default/files/field/image/201604/gettyimages-79687201.jpg" >

Agree on both points
So did Benjani

I reckon loads of people would be interested in buying traditional magic shirts

Aww, you mean a shirt with a picture of a little bunny coming out of a top hat?

Or one with Paul Daniels on it?

Both are about as sensible as Ant Man!!

England did a centenary shirt a few years agohttps://www.newrugbykits.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/England-Rugby-League-Special-Shirt-4-Nations-2014.jpg" >

That was a good one. We actually had a nice Zingari shirt a few years ago toohttps://rugbyshirch.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/warrington16altback.jpg?w

But both of these had sponsors plastered all over them. I’m talking, use modern materials and shapes (so have a white trim around the next but no collar), but have replicas of those old kits.

England RU did it a few years ago with thishttps://sp.imgci.com/PICTURES/CMS/9300/9344.jpg" >
Now that is bloody lovely!

I’d love for Magic Weekend for the next five years to have teams wearing numerous old style kits, no sponsors, modern shapes and materials so they’d sell. Would be class!

The two I’d have back for sure would behttps://3a02v12ku8i343hjuf4c8urp.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/content_images/2/2014/Wolves/Wilderspool/Brian-Bevan-attempts-a-goal-kick-in-his-final-game-for-the-club-on-Easter-Monday-1962.jpg" >

And the one I posted above with Harry Bath holding the Challenge Cup with primrose and blue hoop shirts; white shorts; primrose and blue hoop socks
No white collar or trim around the neck (see Leeds’ home shirt this year), hoops were too thin, no white shorts and it had sponsors all over it.

Think WF actually meant traditional wire shirts rather than what you suggested was meant

Indeed