Have to go with Wigan on this one I'm afraid. Too many tired bodies from the last 2 matches. Wigan will have a strong line up even with their injuries. We've injuries too, but there will be more than 13 tired wire bodies on the pitch.

We've got 5 hours on Wigan. No excuse for tiredness.

Don't see why we should be any more tired than the pies?

Hull match must have taken a lot out of them.
Wigan will bring some fresh players in - partly through necessity.
Gids and Russell will probably come in - both recovering from injuries which is slightly different to being 'rested' - along with someone to replace Westermann.
I hope I'm wrong but the talent machine at bringing young guys through at Wigan means the replacements will be ready.
That's why I think we'll be at the wrong end.
Very happy to be proven wrong !

What has suddenly happened to our strength in depth that we had till 3pm on Monday ? Teams have had to cope with 2 games over Easter since Adam was a lad & until 20 years ago the players had to hold down full time jobs as well.

Ref is Hicks video ref is Bentham.

Difficult to predict with both teams losing players with hopefully some returning, if Gidley is back I would give Patton a go at interchange hooker it may have been hinted at on another thread it's just that I keep going back to Ratchford is a centre.

Gidley back would be a boost but we have other good players to give us a chance of a win, Wigan are doing nothing wrong at the moment so would be favourites on home soil, as for myself always the optimist and looking forward to a good game.

History tells us when things dont go to plan in big games for Wigan, they apply thug tactics.
The loss in the Grand Final still etched in my mind!

TS learnt a valuable lesson from that defeat, not to run a bench with 4 forwards again.
For that reason Ratchford covers all our bases. IMO I think he'll start off the bench, initially as hooker replacement.

Agreed

Since when did Ben Westwood play for Wigan? And was Blake Green your Stand Off that day? I think you're confused.

'People in glass houses...' springs to mind my friend OR 'You started it (the thuggery) and we finished it'.

Whichever you prefer.

Jullien has made a few starts off the bench, Wilde hasn't made any yet this season. However now the 19 man squad is announced, and Jullien isn't included (and I'm surprised by this), I'd guess that Philbin will take the fourth bench spot.*

*If Westerman is out.

When black eyes take you out of a game the same way a broken ankle does.

Who went to hospital and who won MotM tells you all you need to know.

You have an interesting definition of thuggery if what Westwood did doesn't constitute it, but what Hansen did does constitute it. Hansen's was a tackle that wasn't even illegal. Westwoods was a premeditated act of violence that also put Green in hospital. He didn't get MoM because of any good play in particular but because of his bravery in playing on after the assault.

And before this goes any further I quite like Ben Westwood. He's been a great RL player for some years now. I just object to people calling Wigan thugs, when it's clear that acts of thuggery have always had their place in the game. So take off the primrose spectacles.

Back in the day it was normal play, attacking ankles was never the norm.
Still can't believe we haven't adopted the Aus rules on poophouse 3rd man in Wigan tackles at knees or below, tackles that did for Ratchford and Myler.

Does Ratchford have ankles on his thighs?
Didn't Ashton Sims get suspended last season for punching a tackled player whilst he was prone on the ground, oh it was halfback, seems pretty common for your big lads doesn't it?