Salford with ambition probably had the most potential, being close to Manchester and with a huge potential for growth that the likes of Cas/Wakefield didn't have.
IF he can turn Salford into a consistent team (consistently good i mean) then the gates will grow, word of mouth will get around and he'll have a chance.

He needs to get is hands on the stadium too and really develop the land around it too.

Marwan thought he'd get a quick fix (like a Chelsea or Man City) by throwing his money around, personally i think he still needs to do that but at the same time realise it's going to be a slow burner.

I would start with the academy, try his best to make them the best, improve his scouting network, try and grab kids from the south and places in which league isn't so big. He also needs good advisors around him, to the uninitiated Noble seemed like a good appointment, most of us here would probably say that Noble's style was going a little out of fashion, Harris was totally unproven as a winner and being a No.2 at Wigan wasn't necessarily as high profile as he realised.

I think Yed, Harris had a greater imput than people give him credit.

Look at the Pies now... They seem to be unusually poorer in their hb's. And 2/3 seasons back we all said Green and Smith won't work, somebody shaped them and I struggle to believe its was all crafted by an ex-forward of a coach.

The Pies same robot structure is in place but that pivot isnt, and Wane is feeling the heat.
He is being very vocal about refereeing not being fare about other teams being bully tactics against his players. ("something he would never teach his players to do"icon_wink.gif.

It is looking to me that Wane needs the advise of a quality hb coach. If they don't address it soon, I have a very strong feeling that they might be hovering around that bottom half of the table for the rest of the season.

Getting back on topic, I don't think Doc Marwan would still be around Salford to sign Gallen in 3 years time.
He is already vocally pist arf losing £15/20k every week. Now this is bothering him you won't see him being in a hurry to sign Gallen.
In fact he is offloading players at this time to soften his losses.
Hock already gone and he is making twitter jokes about his lock not fitting the key! Expect Locke to be home before the end if this month.

Salford may well see a CC final, but Barton is his problem, he ain't going to get many more support through them turnstiles unless he moves the team nearer to Manchester imo.

He bought the wrong club, like Yed says he thought it would be easy to just throw money at it but he hasn't got a clue about RL, he should of gone for one of Cas/Wakey or KR.

KR maybe, but buying Wakey and Cas has limited growth especially with Rhinos on the doorstep.

I personally would of gone for KR if I had the money and no allegiance to any team, I think with the right development one of the Hull teams could be massive and I mean proper massive.

FC already believe that its them Irishwire.
To be honest both Hull clubs were massive in the early 80's especially FC. As big as the Pies I'm the late 80s.

What on earth are you going on about?

It's over your head.

Yes, that's why I asked what you were going on about.

I assume that it's a diversionary tactic on your part because you came up with the rather silly idea of imposing a ban on starting to employ anyone to play RL who is 31 or over and wanted to gloss over by ignoring a valid point with the usual that you infest these boards with.

Fair guess?

No pal.
I'm not going to explain to you why age and sex in a professional sports team are exempt from some aspects of the equal opportunities act.

just use your loaf and if you really don't understand then why not read up on it instead!

*Cracks knuckles*

Few points:-

1 - There is no such thing as the Equal Opportunities Act. Do you mean the Equality Act?
2 - There is no exemption, whatsoever, for professional sports teams, in the Equality Act - or indeed, in any piece of employment law. However, if I'm wrong about that (I'm not) then I'd be fascinated to hear which bit in particular - can you help?
3 - What you are proposing is Direct Age Discrimination. That is prohibited under s13 of the Equality Act. Now, you can, feasibly, justify direct age discrimination if it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. However, I don't think WWRLFC would be able to do that. If you weren't such an insufferable tit I would go into the detail but I don't think you'd be able to grasp it.

So no, you are not going to explain to me why "age and sex in a professional sports team are exempt from some aspects of the equal opportunities act". Mainly because it is complete . I'm not sure that a career in the legal profession is quite for you pal.

OK pumpkin?

*Drops Mic*

so pedantic.
Do you think I actually care?
I stopped reading when you called me a "tit".
Welcome to a forum.

I think someone will be getting a PM

No UR.
its quite pathetic of me to get involved.
Once he called me a tit, I called time out.

I'll just stick to talking RL.