Quote morrisseyisawire="morrisseyisawire"English football and English RL have one thing in common : the international game is a country mile behind the club game in the minds of most spectators, in terms of importance.
'"
Spot on - If we are being honest, we would all take Wire being successful over England doing well in a World Cup, similar to how I'd sooner see success for Everton over England.
Compare it to Cricket and Rugby Union, where the international game is king - Any national failure and there is usually some sort of inquest at the highest level, which often involves a massive impact on the domestic game and where all efforts are made to rectify things for the national sides, whether its central contracts for the best players in Cricket or the signing of RL players in Union, which are usually financed by the RU authorities.
Can you imagine the reaction of English football clubs and their fans, if the FA's reaction to the latest failure was something drastic, such as cutting foreign quotas to, for example, four or five, or even more drastic like the FA taking 14 or 15 players off their clubs and putting them on central contracts, where the FA had total control over which games they are available for?
You only have to look at the reaction to the merger proposals of the mid 90's to see how RL fans feel about change and their loyalties towards their clubs.