Higham but Chris Hill gets a mention for me too. He's a solid player.

Higham - Superb from 1-80. Worked hard in defense especially at marker and seemed to have an extra yard of pace than on previous appearances.

Suprised there are no mentions of Stefan Ratchford in MOM discussions. Thought he added something when he came on, and his half break and quick PTB set up Mickey's Try.

Bridgey I thought was disappointing. Aside from the 'incident' he made a number of errors and gave away penalty after penalty.

Onwards and Upwards.

Higham !
But as a team we were pretty poor by our own standards and a massive improvement needed next week if we are to win at Leeds !
Woody
Waterhouse

Cooper made some very strong carries in the first half before going off injured.

I'd go with Trent Myler and Higham.

1. Higham
2. Atkins
3. Waterhouse

Thought Myler was great, as was Chris Hill, who is going to be a great player for us.

Myler ... What a great improvement in his defensive work.

Higham for me a great game especially some of his defence at marker.

But I'm lost on the Waterhouse nominations.....Maybe I'm expecting more, but i dont think he has filled Louis Andersons boots yet.

1. Myler
2. Higham
3. Briers

I think t says a lot about the quality of the team last night that Myler AND Higham are being raved about on this thread.

Higham was good in defense and his usual boring in attack. Was lucky not to be spotted on a couple of niggly things (the most obvious being the ball steal in front of the ref) I cannot beleive that in this day and age a team let Higham do his one trick. But he played well, if we can have that sort of Jon Clarke performance from him every week, i'll be happy.

Myler really led well through and is fulfilling all I predicted he would.

Briers saved us in the second half. Kicking was super.

You did once upon a time. Although I suppose by referring to 'backing' you might be making a passive aggressive reference to Simon Moran and sugar daddy. Granted, he's helped but there are plenty of other factors that have contributed to where Warrington are today.

In what way?

He is a different animal to Louis. Sucking in defenders and letting the ball go is a lot less spectacular than skittling people. I think he brings a good balance to what Westwood offers.

Higham worked his socks off which was good to see.
Myler just gets better every game.
Not one stand out individual last night.
As for Waterhouse give him time and we will see the best of him

1. Higham
2. Myler - What a change from a couple of seasons ago when teams could really target him defensively.
3. Ratchford - Showed some great footwork at times.

As for Waterhouse, I thought he had a pretty good game. I think it's easy to underestimate his influence - it always seems to take three or often four defenders to bring him down which helps to create gaps in the line elsewhere and tire the opposition out. I think it's been pretty noticeable that Wire have seemed fitter than the opposition in matches this year which is very impressive when you consider the two early injuries in the Huddersfield game and the last two matches where we weren't dominating possession.

Waterhouse is just a defender magnet, he takes 3 or 4 in every time, the guy creates space, how many times have we seen Atkins running in to space this season, i think he's fantastic.

+1

Getting a bit tedious to watch teams target Myler in defence especially on our own line. He is doing okay though considering is lack of size.

Higham was best for us and I bet no-one would have picked him as a potential MoM before the match! Still far behind Monas though particularly in terms of vision.