1 word dannyirwin - dobber!

I've been a critic myself of Mathers this year, but I agree with an earlier post, his good drastically outweighs the bad. Wish he stayed on to be honest! Anyone who says they don't make mistakes or have an off day, take a look again pal!

Dont think he got enough credit for the tackle on Richards
and his presence forced Carmont towards the touchline
towards the end,Brett Hodgson also makes mistakes
but his plus plays outweigh his minus ,same as Richie
Mathers and most of the full backs in super league.

Cant help thinking if real names were used instead of
usernames on forums half the slagging off would stop,
while everyone has a right to an opinion some of it is
just unnecessary .


Matt King's Barber wrote:Am I right in thinking "lupus non mordet lupum"?

Great comment.

Warrington player or not, can't believe the support for Mathers. He gifted Richards a try by looking at the defender before he caught the ball (unforgivable) and then nearly another score for Farrell by making an utterly embarrassing attempt to pick up a ball on the floor, a technique that is executed better by junior players.

He was very lucky with his covering 'tackles' as well, in fact he completely misses Carmont and it is only the strength of Carmonts hand-off that sends himself into touch. Not much better against Richards either and not forgetting the poor attempt at tackling Tuson.

Warrington can and have done better with the signing of Hodgson. Pity he isn't here now.

I'm really torn on Mathers. He has bags (and bags) of enthusiasm (which we will miss), I bet he is as fit as a fiddle, quite talented in general, and a sound bloke but his execution under pressure is not very good at all. The gymnastic manoeuvre he pulled off to completely miss the ball when all he needed to do was drop on it was shocking and they could have easily scored as a result and probably would have gone on to win the game. Verdict - He is only 80-85% dependable at full back, and that is not enough for a team who is aiming to be the best.

Mathers keeps the game entertaining and on the edge-----end comment

Expect Gansons Optician not to be on here for a few days.

Gansons Optician popularity rating is just below Martin Gleesons at the moment

From his Twitter about this threadhaha it's great! Going to post a reply when I'm back from work and see how much I can wind them up lol.
Maybe he will be back...

Poor lad.


I read some Tweets from a guy called Josh to Mathers saying;

"that danny irwin pr*ck u were awesome to mistakes but everybody makes them what about ur try save on pat? rich > brett"

"exactly love to see him play out there last night, espescially in them conditions, i'm sorry if that has ruined ur day mate"

"i've pm'ed him on that forum mate telling him what a tool he is, keyboard warrior he is, we love u at wire, rich > hogdson!!"



To which Richie at some stage replied;

"ha cheers Josh, jokers like that don't effect me, keyboard supermen who wouldn't know what it's like to play! not a proper fan.."



Someone needs to give him a big hug.

And i'm right...

He doesn't deserved to be treated like that by his OWN fans...

Or Iestyn!

"Definitley one, He was awesome, He did make two mistakes, everybody does mate them, What about his try saver on Pat? I'd rather have Mathers than Hogdson"

"I'd of absolutley loved him to play on Friday, definitley in them conditions, I was sorry if it ruined is day (to switch on your computer and find that after a great win)"

"I have PM'ed him telling him what a tool he is, Definitley a keyboard warrior, I love him at Wire, and would have him than Hodgson"

Next...

Ahh I didn't see those.

I would hate to be called not a "proper fan" by one of the team, it would probably be one of the worst things to ever happen to me.

That's me answering your post about my comments to G Optician.

We all have opinions and we can all be slightly negative, but to go out your way to personally attack an individual directly is way beyond for me.

You show me any player who has never made a crucial mistake, we are only human