sniffs his own crack

I'd class him as a solid administrator - he's executed a simple strategy well. He has done alot of good things and got the sport back onto an even keel financially and moved it forward in a lot of areas - such as negotiating an improved TV deal with Sky. He has also helped to put together a more coherent International schedule.

I think what the game really needs now is more of an entrepreneur - a good promoter basically to help it move on to the next level.

The marketing of the Four Nations has been poor to the neutral / non- traditional supporter. The International game should be seen as a way of bringing new supporters into the game, which will eventually benefit the club game. We should be willing to 'risk' a bigger stadium for one of the 4N games.

As for other sports - I would say what Bernie Ecclestone has done with F1 outshines anything Richard Lewis has or will ever do with RL. Richard Scudamore has also grown the EPL to an unbelievable position worldwide. The France family has helped grow NASCAR from a Southern hick motorsport to the dominate the US racing landscape and become the 4th biggest sporting area in the US.

The Bernie Ecclestone comparison is a bit odd.......especially as many people question Lewis and his expansion policy bringing Celtic in and Leaving Widnes out....

doesnt Ecclestone do the Same....he drops famous Venues like Spa and Silverstone at the drop of a Sheiks Wallet doesnt he....

and considering he oversaw the sports biggest Farce when 6 cars raced in the US grand prix that time....I cant think of a similar thing to throw at Richard Lewis...

And its in Ecclestone's very own interests to make F1 succesful he takes 50% of its revenue.....

I assume Ecclestone and Briatore and the other bloke (the 4th richest Man in the world) will have QPR as Champions of Europe in no time.........??

or is it different when you dont "Make" money out of Soccer club ownership ?

I do Agree that Lewis is a Solid Administrator and someone else is needed to take us to the next level....

My Bernie comment was more about how he has grown it from a rag bag bunch of teams into the billion dollar global business it is today.

F1 gets far more media coverage than it ever did when I was growing up (the 80s /90s) - you were lucky to get the start of the race and then it was straight off at the end. To watch all the BBC coverage now takes up a weekend! Which is great if you love motor racing as I do

Bernie's hands are tied at the minute around the old venues etc. as he is answerable to a VC (CVC) which has taken out massive loans against F1 - they are essentially milking F1 to service the debt on the bonds they've taken out and then will pay all parties when they come to fruition in 2012 - making a tidy profit for everyone (but the people involved). It is this that the real power battle between FOTA and the FIA was about earlier this year (plus getting rid of Mosley) and why they've all signed up till 2012. Then the teams are expecting a more equitable settlement - at the minute around 75% of all the money made from F1 (over a billion dollars) goes out of the sport. A ridiculous situation.
Which is why the teams all reacted angrily when Mosley suggested the budget cap saying they needed to save money etc. when they're seeing most of the revenue go to a VC with no real interest in the sport. The person suggesting also being the one who sold the rights to Bernie for a song at 100m gbp for 100 years.....

I think Bernie if he was in sole charge would be more willing to do a deal with the 'traditional' events. There's also a clause in the Concorde Agreement which means the FIA can protect the 'crown jewel' events - Monaco, France and Britain. Although they didn't do this for the French GP apparently because the FFSA (the French governing body) didn't ask them to intervene. Bernie has also recently done a deal for the German GP to have reduced terms.

Rugby League desperately needs a Bernie. The US farce was more down to poor preparation from Michelin - although interestingly a similar thing happened in NASCAR at the Brickyard 400 (also at Indy) 2 years back where the race was marred by tyre failures and they ended up having to throw yellow flags every 10 laps or so to enable people to pit to change tyres.

I'm afraid I agree with the flying biscuit when it comes to Bernie Ecclestone. Everything he does is done just for him, and the sport seems incapable of reigning him in. How else can the decision to extend his license to manage these rights by 100 years be justified? We're well off-topic now, so best leave it, but we do not need anyone like him - 'Honest Mo Lindsey' as in the same bracket but not as extreme.