WELL SAID

i thought the calls against us especially were very harsh and in a normal SL game would probably have been given 8 times out of 10 but saying that it wasn't his fault that we lost but had we had more luck with the ([sizelancashire[/size) officials it could have been different

The Bridge 'taken out' one, that's a penalty all day long. You prevent him making a tackle, as a result you don't slide and you get caught on an overlap that wouldn't have existed, penalty.

The double movement I would've give in all honesty.

I thought the 'double movement' one was a try as well as Kingy's.

All I seem to have read both on the forums, and in the media, is how hard done to Huddersfield were.

Nowhere does there seem to be any mention of Kings 'no try' which I think could easily have gone our way. The possession that lead to Huddersfields first try came from a two man ball steal on Carvell. The possession that lead to Huddersfields second 'no try' came from Brett Hodgson fielding the ball in goal - watch it again and I'm pretty certain that he had one foot in the field of play when he took the ball on the run, and Huddersfield were clearly offside when the tap was taken. I have seen many references to Andersons knock-on when fielding his charge down - I saw it as coming off his toes. One media report, may have been the Telegraph, comments on how Bentham didn't look at the knock-on totally oblivious to the fact there were two more play the balls before Mathers scored.

Despite clearly being the better team and deserved winners, the blinkered view, not only from other fans but parts of the media too, is starting to leave a slightly sour taste in the mouth.

ok hudds you win you can have that try now lets see the score hudds 22 wire 25 same result? so whats point moaning you lost cause ya bottled it end of now go concentrate on your playoffs although you may get to final but again you wont win it as you aint got any big game players

unlike 99.9% of wire fans you come across as a d!ck


like i said on another day all 3 of those disallowed tries would be given, lunt's was extremely harsh,hodgson's debatable as it could be judged that bridge made a bad call, king's was a 2 on 1 ball steal, however the argument that leroy had control and possession is the debatable issue.

still its chip paper now,as the song goes "whatever will be will be"

the double movement for me was very dubious..at 1st i thought defo try..seeing the replay i still thought try...the bridge one was never a try you simply cant take players out like that...defo no try...yes we did av the rub of the green (for once)...thankfully these decisions never really settled the outcome....