So the first 79 minutes of the game mean nothing then?

So what you are saying is that you are placing the blame for our loss squarely on the shoulders of Chris Bridge?

Bridges drop goal, im talking about the easy kick he missed with 4 minutes to go.

What about the bad decision before half time then?

Yes, IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT WENT BEFORE, IF BRIDGE WOULD HAVE KICKED THAT SIMPLE GOAL WE WOULD NOT HAVE LOST.

Who's to say that Leeds wouldn't have got a kickable penalty anytime after Bridge's missed kick and before Donald's try?

Give it a rest we lost end of.

We made too many mistakes snd they got punished, Mathers mistake for the first try, Chris Bridge spilling a perfect pass which lead to a try from Leeds from their bext set of 6, Paul Johnson`s feeble attempt on Lee Smith, Gareth Carvell`s mistake at the end which lead to another try.

Quite often you will get away with similar mistakes against lesser sides like we apparently did against Celtic, its one we threw away rather than leeds out playing us as we controlled large parts of that game with a good, simple game plan.

Right then if the first 79 minutes mean nothing then we would've lost 6-0.

Finally!!! Someone has got it. One kick means aboslutely nothing. It's the other errors that occured during the game that had a say in the result.

For me it's them mistakes that we need to cut out if we are ever to win anything.

Ok, Chris bridge missing that simple goal had nothing to do what so ever : with us losing.

It felt like everytime after we scored, we seem to make mistakes in the next set.

Well played wire i thought it was good effort from both teams and i'm sure both sets of fans can point to mistakes,refs calls and what could be percieved as bad defence for the oppositions trys but i think both teams can take plenty from the match.
Good luck next week!