No, you were saying that the reason we lost was because Bridge missed a supposedly easy kick. That's what your post implied.

I was just advising you that was not the case.

Look, FOGET was has gone im talking about the last minute if Bridge kicked that goal like he should have, Leeds could not have scored twice in the time what was left to win the the game. But they did have time to score once, which is what they did.

WOULD WE HAVE LOST THE GAME IF BRIDGE DID NOT MISS THAT SIMPLE KICK.......YES OR NO.

You don't win back to back title's against saints if you aint a great side and winning games that look lost are what champion sides do.

No.

So the first 79 minutes of the game mean nothing then?

So what you are saying is that you are placing the blame for our loss squarely on the shoulders of Chris Bridge?

Bridges drop goal, im talking about the easy kick he missed with 4 minutes to go.

What about the bad decision before half time then?

Yes, IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT WENT BEFORE, IF BRIDGE WOULD HAVE KICKED THAT SIMPLE GOAL WE WOULD NOT HAVE LOST.

Who's to say that Leeds wouldn't have got a kickable penalty anytime after Bridge's missed kick and before Donald's try?

Give it a rest we lost end of.

We made too many mistakes snd they got punished, Mathers mistake for the first try, Chris Bridge spilling a perfect pass which lead to a try from Leeds from their bext set of 6, Paul Johnson`s feeble attempt on Lee Smith, Gareth Carvell`s mistake at the end which lead to another try.

Quite often you will get away with similar mistakes against lesser sides like we apparently did against Celtic, its one we threw away rather than leeds out playing us as we controlled large parts of that game with a good, simple game plan.

Right then if the first 79 minutes mean nothing then we would've lost 6-0.