Takes in to account his remorse If only all the mass murderers shown remorse they may only have got 12 months. Always knew he would get the lower end of the scale.

What soddin' remorse???
Absolutely none shown from what I saw.

Completely agree, He shouted "No Way" at the ref, when he was told about his offence.

That 'remorse' mitigation is farcical. It was clearly a deliberate act that he thought he was entitled to carry out at the time.

The fact that 'lovely' Matty Peet probably convinced him to batter his eyelids, say 'sowwy' and give Bentley one of those little bottles of Loch Lomond whisky should be neither here nor there.

I know it's all ifs buts and maybes but if it was the world club challenge next week..what would his ban be

£250 fine

I agree. It was a pernicious and snide hit on a prone player's head, a player who had no opportunity to defend himself. 3 games seems low.

Mind you - it was Bentley

And they clearly missed the tip tackle on Bentley and a forceful pull back of the players jersey from behind.
Clearly rattled our Harry.
Had they considered all the offences together it might well have been the higher end.
I like Smith as a player and think he`s different class to the likes of Dodd.
But there was no remorse whatsoever.

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/63 ... view-panel

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/63 ... view-panel

How come Miller hasn't been cited for rushing in and causing a rumpus?

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/63 ... view-panel

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/63 ... view-panel

Asiata out is massive for us

3 matches for Makinson I think is harsh. Not looked back at it but thought O’Brien would have been cited and the Asiata late hit I thought would get looked at but did not think he would get a ban for it.

It's a tough call trying to be kind given the club and the individual but I agree 3 for Makinson seems harsh and yes agree with you that I too thought O'Brien would be reviewed and I'd have thought he'd be MIA on Friday copping for a 1 week off